head to head · open source
Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF vs fastapi_mcp
Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF has 22,125 GitHub stars, 3,800 forks, 31 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. fastapi_mcp has 12,026 stars, 967 forks, 169 open issues and last shipped 12 months ago. Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF leads on adoption by 84% (22,125 vs 12,026 stars). Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF is written in Python under GPL-3.0; fastapi_mcp is written in Python under MIT. Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF has attracted 17% as many forks as stars, fastapi_mcp 8%. Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF | fastapi_mcp | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 22K | ★ 12K |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-01 | 2025-11-24 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.8K | ⑂ 967 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF if
- You weight community size — 22K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick fastapi_mcp if
- You want the fastapi_mcp feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and fastapi_mcp fits your workflow better
About Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF
Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) is a security research platform for mobile applications in Android, iOS and Windows Mobile. MobSF can be used for a variety of use cases such as mobile application security, penetration testing, malware analysis, and privacy analysis. The Static Analyzer supports popular mobile app binaries like APK, IPA, APPX and source code. Meanwhile, the Dynamic Analyzer supports both Android and iOS applications and offers a platform for interactive instrumented testing, runtime data and network traffic analysis. MobSF seamlessly integrates with your…
read the full Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF overview →
About fastapi_mcp
Built by Tadata FastAPI MCP Expose your FastAPI endpoints as Model Context Protocol (MCP) tools, with Auth! Features Authentication built in, using your existing FastAPI dependencies! FastAPI native: Not just another OpenAPI MCP converter Zero/Minimal configuration required just point it at your FastAPI app and it works Preserving schemas of your request models and response models Preserve documentation of all your endpoints, just as it is in Swagger Flexible deployment Mount your MCP server to the same app, or deploy separately ASGI transport Uses FastAPI's ASGI interface directly for efficient communication…
read the full fastapi_mcp overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More API Development & Testing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF or fastapi_mcp more popular?
Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF has 22,125 GitHub stars and fastapi_mcp has 12,026. Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF has the larger community by that measure.
Are Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF and fastapi_mcp free?
Both are open source. Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF is licensed under GPL-3.0 and fastapi_mcp under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF and fastapi_mcp?
Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF is written in Python and fastapi_mcp in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF or fastapi_mcp?
Choose Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF if you want the larger community (22,125 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose fastapi_mcp if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.