head to head · open source

etcd vs ubicloud

etcd has 52,270 GitHub stars, 10,506 forks, 351 open issues and last shipped today. ubicloud has 12,267 stars, 587 forks, 95 open issues and last shipped today. etcd leads on adoption by 326% (52,270 vs 12,267 stars). etcd is written in Go under Apache-2.0; ubicloud is written in Ruby under AGPL-3.0. etcd has attracted 20% as many forks as stars, ubicloud 5%. ubicloud was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (kubernetes), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

etcd ★ 52K ubicloud ★ 12K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

etcd ubicloud
GitHub stars ★ 52K ★ 12K
License Apache-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Go Ruby
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 11K ⑂ 587
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick etcd if

  • You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full etcd profile →

pick ubicloud if

  • You want the ubicloud feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Ruby
  • You evaluated both and ubicloud fits your workflow better

full ubicloud profile →

About etcd

etcd is an Apache 2.0 licensed, Go written distributed key value store that holds the most critical data of a distributed system in a Raft replicated log, aimed at the platform and infrastructure engineers who must keep that control plane data consistent and available.

read the full etcd overview →

About ubicloud

Ubicloud is an open source cloud platform that delivers IaaS features — elastic compute, non replicated block storage, firewall and load balancer, managed Postgres, Kubernetes, AI inference, and IAM services — on bare metal hardware, for teams that want public cloud convenience without closed source lock in or premium rental pricing.

read the full ubicloud overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs etcd mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

etcd vs mall etcd vs Prometheus etcd vs NocoDB etcd vs DBeaver etcd vs orm etcd vs Milvus etcd vs TiDB etcd vs drawDB etcd vs typeorm etcd vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager etcd vs Qdrant etcd vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is etcd or ubicloud more popular?

etcd has 52,270 GitHub stars and ubicloud has 12,267. etcd has the larger community by that measure.

Are etcd and ubicloud free?

Both are open source. etcd is licensed under Apache-2.0 and ubicloud under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between etcd and ubicloud?

etcd is written in Go and ubicloud in Ruby. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, etcd or ubicloud?

Choose etcd if you want the larger community (52,270 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose ubicloud if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.