head to head · open source

etcd vs surging

etcd has 52,270 GitHub stars, 10,506 forks, 351 open issues and last shipped yesterday. surging has 3,265 stars, 918 forks, 255 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. etcd leads on adoption by 1,501% (52,270 vs 3,265 stars). etcd is written in Go under Apache-2.0; surging is written in C# under MIT. etcd has attracted 20% as many forks as stars, surging 28%. etcd was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

etcd ★ 52K surging ★ 3.3K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

etcd surging
GitHub stars ★ 52K ★ 3.3K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go C#
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-04-10
Forks ⑂ 11K ⑂ 918
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick etcd if

  • You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full etcd profile →

pick surging if

  • You want the surging feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and surging fits your workflow better

full surging profile →

About etcd

etcd is an Apache 2.0 licensed, Go written distributed key value store that holds the most critical data of a distributed system in a Raft replicated log, aimed at the platform and infrastructure engineers who must keep that control plane data consistent and available.

read the full etcd overview →

About surging

Surging is an open source, MIT licensed C microservices engine that provides a lightweight, high performance, modular RPC request pipeline with support for the Event based Asynchronous Pattern and reactive programming, aimed at .NET teams that need distributed service invocation without adopting a heavier platform.

read the full surging overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs etcd supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack llama-index vs haystack compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job langgraph vs haystack compose vs gitleaks trivy vs gitleaks

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

etcd vs mall etcd vs Prometheus etcd vs NocoDB etcd vs DBeaver etcd vs orm etcd vs Milvus etcd vs TiDB etcd vs drawDB etcd vs typeorm etcd vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager etcd vs Qdrant etcd vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is etcd or surging more popular?

etcd has 52,270 GitHub stars and surging has 3,265. etcd has the larger community by that measure.

Are etcd and surging free?

Both are open source. etcd is licensed under Apache-2.0 and surging under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between etcd and surging?

etcd is written in Go and surging in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, etcd or surging?

Choose etcd if you want the larger community (52,270 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose surging if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.