head to head · open source
etcd vs SqlSugar
etcd has 52,441 GitHub stars, 10,552 forks, 351 open issues and last shipped yesterday. SqlSugar has 5,844 stars, 1,391 forks, 15 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. etcd leads on adoption by 797% (52,441 vs 5,844 stars). etcd is written in Go under Apache-2.0; SqlSugar is written in C# under MIT. etcd has attracted 20% as many forks as stars, SqlSugar 24%. etcd was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| etcd | SqlSugar | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 52K | ★ 5.8K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Go | C# |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-09-13 |
| Forks | ⑂ 11K | ⑂ 1.4K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick etcd if
- You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick SqlSugar if
- You want the SqlSugar feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches C#
- You evaluated both and SqlSugar fits your workflow better
About etcd
etcd Note : The main branch may be in an unstable or even broken state during development. For stable versions, see [releases][github release]. etcd is a distributed reliable key value store for the most critical data of a distributed system, with a focus on being: Simple : well defined, user facing API (gRPC) Secure : automatic TLS with optional client cert authentication Fast : benchmarked 10,000 writes/sec Reliable : properly distributed using Raft etcd is written in Go and uses the [Raft][] consensus algorithm to manage a highly available replicated log. etcd is used in production by many companies, and the…
About SqlSugar
English 中文 SqlSugar ORM SqlSugar is .NET open source ORM framework, maintained and updated by Fructose Big Data Technology team, the most easy to use ORM out of the box Advantages: [Low code] [High performance] [Super simple] [Comprehensive features] [ Multi database compatible] [Suitable products] Support .NET .net framework.net core3.1.ne5.net6.net7.net8 .net9 .net10 Support database MySql、SqlServer、Sqlite、Oracle 、 postgresql、达梦、Mongodb 人大金仓(国产推荐)、神通数据库、瀚高、Access DB2、DuckDb、Hana、OceanBase TDengine QuestDb Clickhouse MySqlConnector、华为 GaussDB 南大通用 GBase、MariaDB、Tidb、Odbc、Percona Server, Amazon Aurora、Azure…
read the full SqlSugar overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Databases projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.
Frequently asked questions
Is etcd or SqlSugar more popular?
etcd has 52,441 GitHub stars and SqlSugar has 5,844. etcd has the larger community by that measure.
Are etcd and SqlSugar free?
Both are open source. etcd is licensed under Apache-2.0 and SqlSugar under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between etcd and SqlSugar?
etcd is written in Go and SqlSugar in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, etcd or SqlSugar?
Choose etcd if you want the larger community (52,441 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose SqlSugar if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.