head to head · open source

etcd vs sh

etcd has 52,270 GitHub stars, 10,506 forks, 351 open issues and last shipped yesterday. sh has 3,151 stars, 1,013 forks, 80 open issues and last shipped yesterday. etcd leads on adoption by 1,559% (52,270 vs 3,151 stars). etcd is written in Go under Apache-2.0; sh is written in Shell under Apache-2.0. etcd has attracted 20% as many forks as stars, sh 32%. sh was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

etcd ★ 52K sh ★ 3.2K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

etcd sh
GitHub stars ★ 52K ★ 3.2K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Shell
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 11K ⑂ 1.0K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick etcd if

  • You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full etcd profile →

pick sh if

  • You want the sh feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Shell
  • You evaluated both and sh fits your workflow better

full sh profile →

About etcd

etcd is an Apache 2.0 licensed, Go written distributed key value store that holds the most critical data of a distributed system in a Raft replicated log, aimed at the platform and infrastructure engineers who must keep that control plane data consistent and available.

read the full etcd overview →

About sh

kejilion.sh is an all in one Linux management script — a root level Shell toolbox for VPS owners, self hosters and administrators that gathers system monitoring, Docker management, LDNMP site deployment, backups and site protection into one interactive tool.

read the full sh overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs etcd supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack llama-index vs haystack compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job langgraph vs haystack compose vs gitleaks trivy vs gitleaks

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

etcd vs mall etcd vs Prometheus etcd vs NocoDB etcd vs DBeaver etcd vs orm etcd vs Milvus etcd vs TiDB etcd vs drawDB etcd vs typeorm etcd vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager etcd vs Qdrant etcd vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is etcd or sh more popular?

etcd has 52,270 GitHub stars and sh has 3,151. etcd has the larger community by that measure.

Are etcd and sh free?

Both are open source. etcd is licensed under Apache-2.0 and sh under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between etcd and sh?

etcd is written in Go and sh in Shell. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, etcd or sh?

Choose etcd if you want the larger community (52,270 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose sh if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.