head to head · open source

etcd vs Neon Postgres

etcd has 52,270 GitHub stars, 10,504 forks, 351 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Neon Postgres has 23,099 stars, 1,096 forks, 558 open issues and last shipped 18 days ago. etcd leads on adoption by 126% (52,270 vs 23,099 stars). etcd is written in Go under Apache-2.0; Neon Postgres is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. etcd has attracted 20% as many forks as stars, Neon Postgres 5%. etcd was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (database), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

etcd ★ 52K Neon Postgres ★ 23K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

etcd Neon Postgres
GitHub stars ★ 52K ★ 23K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Rust
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-08-31
Forks ⑂ 11K ⑂ 1.1K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick etcd if

  • You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full etcd profile →

pick Neon Postgres if

  • You want the Neon Postgres feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and Neon Postgres fits your workflow better

full Neon Postgres profile →

About etcd

etcd is an Apache 2.0 licensed, Go written distributed key value store that holds the most critical data of a distributed system in a Raft replicated log, aimed at the platform and infrastructure engineers who must keep that control plane data consistent and available.

read the full etcd overview →

About Neon Postgres

Neon is an open source serverless Postgres database platform. It separates storage and compute, and it substitutes the PostgreSQL storage layer by redistributing data across a cluster of nodes. The project lives in the Postgres and serverless database ecosystem.

read the full Neon Postgres overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs etcd mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

etcd vs mall etcd vs Prometheus etcd vs NocoDB etcd vs DBeaver etcd vs orm etcd vs Milvus etcd vs TiDB etcd vs drawDB etcd vs typeorm etcd vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager etcd vs Qdrant etcd vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is etcd or Neon Postgres more popular?

etcd has 52,270 GitHub stars and Neon Postgres has 23,099. etcd has the larger community by that measure.

Are etcd and Neon Postgres free?

Both are open source. etcd is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Neon Postgres under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between etcd and Neon Postgres?

etcd is written in Go and Neon Postgres in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, etcd or Neon Postgres?

Choose etcd if you want the larger community (52,270 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Neon Postgres if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.