head to head · open source

etcd vs kvrocks

etcd has 52,270 GitHub stars, 10,506 forks, 351 open issues and last shipped yesterday. kvrocks has 4,433 stars, 660 forks, 250 open issues and last shipped yesterday. etcd leads on adoption by 1,079% (52,270 vs 4,433 stars). etcd is written in Go under Apache-2.0; kvrocks is written in C++ under Apache-2.0. etcd has attracted 20% as many forks as stars, kvrocks 15%. kvrocks was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (database), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

etcd ★ 52K kvrocks ★ 4.4K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

etcd kvrocks
GitHub stars ★ 52K ★ 4.4K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go C++
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 11K ⑂ 660
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick etcd if

  • You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full etcd profile →

pick kvrocks if

  • You want the kvrocks feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and kvrocks fits your workflow better

full kvrocks profile →

About etcd

etcd is an Apache 2.0 licensed, Go written distributed key value store that holds the most critical data of a distributed system in a Raft replicated log, aimed at the platform and infrastructure engineers who must keep that control plane data consistent and available.

read the full etcd overview →

About kvrocks

Apache Kvrocks is a distributed key value NoSQL database from the Apache Software Foundation that uses RocksDB as its storage engine and speaks the Redis protocol, aimed at teams that need Redis compatible access with lower memory cost and higher capacity than an in memory deployment.

read the full kvrocks overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs etcd supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack llama-index vs haystack compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job langgraph vs haystack compose vs gitleaks trivy vs gitleaks

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

etcd vs mall etcd vs Prometheus etcd vs NocoDB etcd vs DBeaver etcd vs orm etcd vs Milvus etcd vs TiDB etcd vs drawDB etcd vs typeorm etcd vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager etcd vs Qdrant etcd vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is etcd or kvrocks more popular?

etcd has 52,270 GitHub stars and kvrocks has 4,433. etcd has the larger community by that measure.

Are etcd and kvrocks free?

Both are open source. etcd is licensed under Apache-2.0 and kvrocks under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between etcd and kvrocks?

etcd is written in Go and kvrocks in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, etcd or kvrocks?

Choose etcd if you want the larger community (52,270 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose kvrocks if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.