head to head · open source

etcd vs finagle

etcd has 52,270 GitHub stars, 10,506 forks, 351 open issues and last shipped today. finagle has 8,866 stars, 1,428 forks, 65 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. etcd leads on adoption by 490% (52,270 vs 8,866 stars). etcd is written in Go under Apache-2.0; finagle is written in Scala under Apache-2.0. etcd has attracted 20% as many forks as stars, finagle 16%. etcd was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (distributed-systems), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

etcd ★ 52K finagle ★ 8.9K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

etcd finagle
GitHub stars ★ 52K ★ 8.9K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Scala
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-08-13
Forks ⑂ 11K ⑂ 1.4K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick etcd if

  • You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full etcd profile →

pick finagle if

  • You want the finagle feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Scala
  • You evaluated both and finagle fits your workflow better

full finagle profile →

About etcd

etcd is an Apache 2.0 licensed, Go written distributed key value store that holds the most critical data of a distributed system in a Raft replicated log, aimed at the platform and infrastructure engineers who must keep that control plane data consistent and available.

read the full etcd overview →

About finagle

Finagle is a fault tolerant, protocol agnostic RPC system for the JVM, written in Scala and used to construct high concurrency servers, and it is aimed at JVM engineers who want one uniform client and server API across several network protocols instead of a separate stack for each one.

read the full finagle overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs etcd mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

etcd vs mall etcd vs Prometheus etcd vs NocoDB etcd vs DBeaver etcd vs orm etcd vs Milvus etcd vs TiDB etcd vs drawDB etcd vs typeorm etcd vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager etcd vs Qdrant etcd vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is etcd or finagle more popular?

etcd has 52,270 GitHub stars and finagle has 8,866. etcd has the larger community by that measure.

Are etcd and finagle free?

Both are open source. etcd is licensed under Apache-2.0 and finagle under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between etcd and finagle?

etcd is written in Go and finagle in Scala. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, etcd or finagle?

Choose etcd if you want the larger community (52,270 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose finagle if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.