head to head · open source

etcd vs dbgate

etcd has 52,270 GitHub stars, 10,506 forks, 351 open issues and last shipped today. dbgate has 7,314 stars, 474 forks, 461 open issues and last shipped yesterday. etcd leads on adoption by 615% (52,270 vs 7,314 stars). etcd is written in Go under Apache-2.0; dbgate is written in JavaScript under GPL-3.0. etcd has attracted 20% as many forks as stars, dbgate 6%. etcd was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

etcd ★ 52K dbgate ★ 7.3K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

etcd dbgate
GitHub stars ★ 52K ★ 7.3K
License Apache-2.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Go JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 11K ⑂ 474
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick etcd if

  • You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full etcd profile →

pick dbgate if

  • You want the dbgate feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and dbgate fits your workflow better

full dbgate profile →

About etcd

etcd is an Apache 2.0 licensed, Go written distributed key value store that holds the most critical data of a distributed system in a Raft replicated log, aimed at the platform and infrastructure engineers who must keep that control plane data consistent and available.

read the full etcd overview →

About dbgate

DbGate is a cross platform, GPL 3.0 licensed database manager for MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQL Server, MongoDB, SQLite and a dozen further engines, built for developers and data engineers who work with several databases at once and want one client on Windows, Linux, macOS or in a browser.

read the full dbgate overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs etcd mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

etcd vs mall etcd vs Prometheus etcd vs NocoDB etcd vs DBeaver etcd vs orm etcd vs Milvus etcd vs TiDB etcd vs drawDB etcd vs typeorm etcd vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager etcd vs Qdrant etcd vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is etcd or dbgate more popular?

etcd has 52,270 GitHub stars and dbgate has 7,314. etcd has the larger community by that measure.

Are etcd and dbgate free?

Both are open source. etcd is licensed under Apache-2.0 and dbgate under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between etcd and dbgate?

etcd is written in Go and dbgate in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, etcd or dbgate?

Choose etcd if you want the larger community (52,270 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose dbgate if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.