head to head · open source

dua-cli vs Reef

dua-cli has 6,278 GitHub stars, 169 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. Reef has 603 stars, 31 forks, 37 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. dua-cli leads on adoption by 941% (6,278 vs 603 stars). dua-cli is written in Rust under MIT; Reef is written in Swift under MIT. dua-cli has attracted 3% as many forks as stars, Reef 5%. dua-cli was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

dua-cli ★ 6.3K Reef ★ 603 category Productivity & Utilities

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

dua-cli Reef
GitHub stars ★ 6.3K ★ 603
License MIT MIT
Written in Rust Swift
Last push 2026-09-12 2026-06-28
Forks ⑂ 169 ⑂ 31
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick dua-cli if

  • You weight community size — 6.3K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full dua-cli profile →

pick Reef if

  • You want the Reef feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Swift
  • You evaluated both and Reef fits your workflow better

full Reef profile →

About dua-cli

dua cli is a terminal based, parallel disk usage analyzer written in Rust that reports how much space a directory consumes and optionally deletes unwanted data, built for developers, system administrators, and anyone cleaning up storage from a shell rather than a graphical desktop application.

read the full dua-cli overview →

About Reef

Reef is a free, MIT licensed macOS window manager that binds applications to number keys and gives each app its own Alt Tab style switcher, aimed at Mac users who want to refocus any window of any app from the keyboard instead of hunting through the Dock or Mission Control.

read the full Reef overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

n8n vs mole n8n vs pearcleaner n8n vs bleachbit excalidraw vs mole rustdesk vs mole excalidraw vs pearcleaner excalidraw vs bleachbit rustdesk vs pearcleaner openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More System Cleanup & Optimization projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the System Cleanup & Optimization field.

dua-cli vs Mole dua-cli vs nnn dua-cli vs Pearcleaner dua-cli vs BleachBit dua-cli vs gdu dua-cli vs RyTuneX dua-cli vs pomatez dua-cli vs memories dua-cli vs portabase dua-cli vs burrow dua-cli vs resticprofile dua-cli vs curbox-android

Frequently asked questions

Is dua-cli or Reef more popular?

dua-cli has 6,278 GitHub stars and Reef has 603. dua-cli has the larger community by that measure.

Are dua-cli and Reef free?

Both are open source. dua-cli is licensed under MIT and Reef under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between dua-cli and Reef?

dua-cli is written in Rust and Reef in Swift. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, dua-cli or Reef?

Choose dua-cli if you want the larger community (6,278 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Reef if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.