head to head · open source

dua-cli vs burrow

dua-cli has 6,278 GitHub stars, 169 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. burrow has 1,429 stars, 176 forks, 58 open issues and last shipped yesterday. dua-cli leads on adoption by 339% (6,278 vs 1,429 stars). dua-cli is written in Rust under MIT; burrow is written in Swift under MIT. dua-cli has attracted 3% as many forks as stars, burrow 12%. burrow was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (cleaner, disk-usage), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

dua-cli ★ 6.3K burrow ★ 1.4K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

dua-cli burrow
GitHub stars ★ 6.3K ★ 1.4K
License MIT MIT
Written in Rust Swift
Last push 2026-09-12 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 169 ⑂ 176
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick dua-cli if

  • You weight community size — 6.3K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full dua-cli profile →

pick burrow if

  • You want the burrow feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Swift
  • You evaluated both and burrow fits your workflow better

full burrow profile →

About dua-cli

dua cli is a terminal based, parallel disk usage analyzer written in Rust that reports how much space a directory consumes and optionally deletes unwanted data, built for developers, system administrators, and anyone cleaning up storage from a shell rather than a graphical desktop application.

read the full dua-cli overview →

About burrow

Burrow is a free, open source (MIT), native macOS app that combines junk cleanup, app management, maintenance, disk analysis, and live system status in one window, with a built in MCP server so AI agents such as Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor can query and care for the same machine.

read the full burrow overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

n8n vs mole n8n vs pearcleaner n8n vs bleachbit excalidraw vs mole rustdesk vs mole excalidraw vs pearcleaner excalidraw vs bleachbit rustdesk vs pearcleaner openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More System Cleanup & Optimization projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the System Cleanup & Optimization field.

dua-cli vs Mole dua-cli vs nnn dua-cli vs Pearcleaner dua-cli vs BleachBit dua-cli vs gdu dua-cli vs RyTuneX dua-cli vs pomatez dua-cli vs memories dua-cli vs portabase dua-cli vs resticprofile dua-cli vs curbox-android dua-cli vs git-sync

Frequently asked questions

Is dua-cli or burrow more popular?

dua-cli has 6,278 GitHub stars and burrow has 1,429. dua-cli has the larger community by that measure.

Are dua-cli and burrow free?

Both are open source. dua-cli is licensed under MIT and burrow under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between dua-cli and burrow?

dua-cli is written in Rust and burrow in Swift. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, dua-cli or burrow?

Choose dua-cli if you want the larger community (6,278 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose burrow if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.