head to head · open source

Qdrant vs Dragonfly

Qdrant has 34,650 GitHub stars, 2,682 forks, 704 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Dragonfly has 31,579 stars, 1,264 forks, 308 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Qdrant leads on adoption by 10% (34,650 vs 31,579 stars). Qdrant is written in Rust under Apache-2.0; Dragonfly is written in C++ under a custom or non-standard licence. Qdrant has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, Dragonfly 4%. Qdrant was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Qdrant ★ 35K Dragonfly ★ 32K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

Qdrant Dragonfly
GitHub stars ★ 35K ★ 32K
License Apache-2.0 Custom / other
Written in Rust C++
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.7K ⑂ 1.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Qdrant if

  • You weight community size — 35K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Qdrant profile →

pick Dragonfly if

  • You want the Dragonfly feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and Dragonfly fits your workflow better

full Dragonfly profile →

About Qdrant

Qdrant is a vector similarity search engine and database built in Rust, designed for production use in AI applications. It stores, manages, and retrieves high dimensional vectors alongside associated metadata (payloads), supporting fast nearest neighbor search with filtering. It solves the problem of efficiently performing semantic or neural based matching at scale—such as finding similar images, recommending content, or powering retrieval augmented generation (RAG)—by replacing slow or inflexible brute force or index based approaches with a purpose built engine optimized for vector operations.…

read the full Qdrant overview →

About Dragonfly

Dragonfly is a C++ in memory data store that speaks the Redis and Memcached APIs, built for teams that want more throughput and lower resource use from an existing cache or key value workload without changing application code.

read the full Dragonfly overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

meilisearch vs qdrant supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack llama-index vs haystack compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job langgraph vs haystack compose vs gitleaks

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

Qdrant vs mall Qdrant vs Prometheus Qdrant vs NocoDB Qdrant vs etcd Qdrant vs DBeaver Qdrant vs orm Qdrant vs Milvus Qdrant vs TiDB Qdrant vs drawDB Qdrant vs typeorm Qdrant vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager Qdrant vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is Qdrant or Dragonfly more popular?

Qdrant has 34,650 GitHub stars and Dragonfly has 31,579. Qdrant has the larger community by that measure.

Are Qdrant and Dragonfly free?

Both are open source. Qdrant is licensed under Apache-2.0, and Dragonfly has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Qdrant and Dragonfly?

Qdrant is written in Rust and Dragonfly in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Qdrant or Dragonfly?

Choose Qdrant if you want the larger community (34,650 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Dragonfly if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.