head to head · open source
Docuseal vs Wraft
Docuseal has 18,558 GitHub stars, 1,867 forks, 121 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Wraft has 165 stars, 31 forks, 17 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. Docuseal leads on adoption by 11,147% (18,558 vs 165 stars). Docuseal is written in Ruby under AGPL-3.0; Wraft is written in Elixir under AGPL-3.0. Docuseal has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, Wraft 19%. Docuseal was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (open-source, self-hosted), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Docuseal | Wraft | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 19K | ★ 165 |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Ruby | Elixir |
| Last push | 2026-09-14 | 2026-07-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.9K | ⑂ 31 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Docuseal if
- You weight community size — 19K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Ruby
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Wraft if
- You want the Wraft feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Elixir
- You evaluated both and Wraft fits your workflow better
About Docuseal
Docuseal is an open source document filling and signing platform for individuals and teams, and its repository describes it as an open source alternative to DocuSign. It is built in Ruby on Rails and uses a self hosted deployment model, with interface components associated with Tailwind CSS, Vue, and Hotwire Turbo.
read the full Docuseal overview →
About Wraft
Wraft is an open source Document Lifecycle Management platform for teams that need to author, collaborate on, and distribute structured business documents such as official letters and contracts while keeping their content in open markdown and JSON formats.
read the full Wraft overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Document Management & E-Signatures projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Document Management & E-Signatures field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Docuseal or Wraft more popular?
Docuseal has 18,558 GitHub stars and Wraft has 165. Docuseal has the larger community by that measure.
Are Docuseal and Wraft free?
Both are open source. Docuseal is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Wraft under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Docuseal and Wraft?
Docuseal is written in Ruby and Wraft in Elixir. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Docuseal or Wraft?
Choose Docuseal if you want the larger community (18,558 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Wraft if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.