head to head · open source

Docuseal vs mm-wiki

Docuseal has 18,558 GitHub stars, 1,867 forks, 121 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. mm-wiki has 3,774 stars, 849 forks, 175 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. Docuseal leads on adoption by 392% (18,558 vs 3,774 stars). Docuseal is written in Ruby under AGPL-3.0; mm-wiki is written in Go under MIT. Docuseal has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, mm-wiki 22%. Docuseal was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (documents), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Docuseal ★ 19K mm-wiki ★ 3.8K category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Docuseal mm-wiki
GitHub stars ★ 19K ★ 3.8K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Ruby Go
Last push 2026-09-14 2026-04-05
Forks ⑂ 1.9K ⑂ 849
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Docuseal if

  • You weight community size — 19K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Ruby
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Docuseal profile →

pick mm-wiki if

  • You want the mm-wiki feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and mm-wiki fits your workflow better

full mm-wiki profile →

About Docuseal

Docuseal is an open source document filling and signing platform for individuals and teams, and its repository describes it as an open source alternative to DocuSign. It is built in Ruby on Rails and uses a self hosted deployment model, with interface components associated with Tailwind CSS, Vue, and Hotwire Turbo.

read the full Docuseal overview →

About mm-wiki

MM Wiki open source Go wiki. It lives in self hosted team knowledge sharing and document management ecosystem. It helps teams build enterprise Wiki and internal documentation platform. It is MIT licensed. Topics connect it to Confluence and DokuWiki. It provides spaces, documents, roles, search, attachments, Markdown editing.

read the full mm-wiki overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K

Related comparisons

docuseal vs bentopdf docuseal vs documenso docuseal vs papermark docuseal vs pdfcpu docuseal vs opensign bentopdf vs documenso bentopdf vs papermark bentopdf vs pdfcpu plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki cal-com vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor cal-com vs tutor

More Document Management & E-Signatures projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Document Management & E-Signatures field.

Docuseal vs bentopdf Docuseal vs Documenso Docuseal vs Papermark Docuseal vs pdfcpu Docuseal vs OpenSign Docuseal vs Papra Docuseal vs organize Docuseal vs community Docuseal vs docspell Docuseal vs PaperKnife Docuseal vs pdfx Docuseal vs signaturepdf

Frequently asked questions

Is Docuseal or mm-wiki more popular?

Docuseal has 18,558 GitHub stars and mm-wiki has 3,774. Docuseal has the larger community by that measure.

Are Docuseal and mm-wiki free?

Both are open source. Docuseal is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and mm-wiki under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Docuseal and mm-wiki?

Docuseal is written in Ruby and mm-wiki in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Docuseal or mm-wiki?

Choose Docuseal if you want the larger community (18,558 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose mm-wiki if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.