head to head · open source

Docuseal vs pdfcraft

Docuseal has 18,671 GitHub stars, 1,884 forks, 121 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. pdfcraft has 2,684 stars, 903 forks, 68 open issues and last shipped today. Docuseal leads on adoption by 596% (18,671 vs 2,684 stars). Docuseal is written in Ruby under AGPL-3.0; pdfcraft is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. Docuseal has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, pdfcraft 34%. pdfcraft was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (documents, pdf), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Docuseal ★ 19K pdfcraft ★ 2.7K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Docuseal pdfcraft
GitHub stars ★ 19K ★ 2.7K
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Ruby Rust
Last push 2026-10-05 2026-10-08
Forks ⑂ 1.9K ⑂ 903
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Docuseal if

  • You weight community size — 19K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Ruby
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Docuseal profile →

pick pdfcraft if

  • You want the pdfcraft feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and pdfcraft fits your workflow better

full pdfcraft profile →

About Docuseal

Docuseal is an open source document filling and signing platform for individuals and teams, and its repository describes it as an open source alternative to DocuSign. It is built in Ruby on Rails and uses a self hosted deployment model, with interface components associated with Tailwind CSS, Vue, and Hotwire Turbo.

read the full Docuseal overview →

About pdfcraft

PdfCraft is an open source, clean room reimplementation of Adobe Acrobat built in pure Rust, aimed at anyone who wants a fast native tool to read, organize, secure and edit PDFs without an account or a cloud connection.

read the full pdfcraft overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 61K Twenty ★ 58K Odoo ★ 55K marketingskills ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K

Related comparisons

docuseal vs bentopdf docuseal vs documenso docuseal vs papermark docuseal vs pdfcpu docuseal vs opensign bentopdf vs documenso bentopdf vs papermark bentopdf vs pdfcpu opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip

More Document Management & E-Signatures projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Document Management & E-Signatures field.

Docuseal vs bentopdf Docuseal vs Documenso Docuseal vs Papermark Docuseal vs pdfcpu Docuseal vs OpenSign Docuseal vs Papra Docuseal vs mm-wiki Docuseal vs organize Docuseal vs printcraft Docuseal vs community Docuseal vs docspell Docuseal vs PaperKnife

Frequently asked questions

Is Docuseal or pdfcraft more popular?

Docuseal has 18,671 GitHub stars and pdfcraft has 2,684. Docuseal has the larger community by that measure.

Are Docuseal and pdfcraft free?

Both are open source. Docuseal is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and pdfcraft under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Docuseal and pdfcraft?

Docuseal is written in Ruby and pdfcraft in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Docuseal or pdfcraft?

Choose Docuseal if you want the larger community (18,671 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose pdfcraft if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.