head to head · open source
Docker vs Yearning
Docker has 72,238 GitHub stars, 19,309 forks, 3,902 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Yearning has 8,975 stars, 2,034 forks, 165 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. Docker leads on adoption by 705% (72,238 vs 8,975 stars). Docker is written in Go under Apache-2.0; Yearning is written in Go under AGPL-3.0. Docker has attracted 27% as many forks as stars, Yearning 23%. Docker was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (go, golang), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Docker | Yearning | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 72K | ★ 9.0K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Go | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-03 | 2026-08-24 |
| Forks | ⑂ 19K | ⑂ 2.0K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Docker if
- You weight community size — 72K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Yearning if
- You want the Yearning feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and Yearning fits your workflow better
About Docker
The Moby Project ================ Moby is an open source project created by Docker to enable and accelerate software containerization. It provides a "Lego set" of toolkit components, the framework for assembling them into custom container based systems, and a place for all container enthusiasts and professionals to experiment and exchange ideas. Components include container build tools, a container registry, orchestration tools, a runtime and more, and these can be used as building blocks in conjunction with other tools and projects. Principles Moby is an open project guided by strong principles, aiming to be…
read the full Docker overview →
About Yearning
Yearning A robust, locally deployed platform designed for seamless SQL detection and query auditing, tailored specifically for DBAs and developers. Focused on privacy and efficiency, it provides an intuitive and secure environment for MYSQL auditing. ?style=flat square&logoColor=white&logo=linux) [![][github license shield]][github license link] [![][github forks shield]][github forks link] [![][github stars shield]][github stars link] English 简体中文 日本語 ✨ Features AI Assistant : Our AI assistant offers real time SQL optimization suggestions, enhancing SQL performance. It also supports text to SQL conversion…
read the full Yearning overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Cloud Infrastructure Management projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Cloud Infrastructure Management field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Docker or Yearning more popular?
Docker has 72,238 GitHub stars and Yearning has 8,975. Docker has the larger community by that measure.
Are Docker and Yearning free?
Both are open source. Docker is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Yearning under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Docker and Yearning?
Docker is written in Go and Yearning in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Docker or Yearning?
Choose Docker if you want the larger community (72,238 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Yearning if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.