head to head · open source

Docker vs terravision

Docker has 72,143 GitHub stars, 19,234 forks, 3,902 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. terravision has 1,640 stars, 176 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Docker leads on adoption by 4,299% (72,143 vs 1,640 stars). Docker is written in Go under Apache-2.0; terravision is written in Python under AGPL-3.0. Docker has attracted 27% as many forks as stars, terravision 11%. terravision was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Docker ★ 72K terravision ★ 1.6K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Docker terravision
GitHub stars ★ 72K ★ 1.6K
License Apache-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Go Python
Last push 2026-10-01 2026-10-02
Forks ⑂ 19K ⑂ 176
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Docker if

  • You weight community size — 72K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Docker profile →

pick terravision if

  • You want the terravision feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and terravision fits your workflow better

full terravision profile →

About Docker

Docker, published here as the Moby Project, is the open source collection of container toolkit components and the framework for assembling them into custom container based systems, built for engineers, integrators and enthusiasts who want to modify, hack and build on container code rather than buy a commercially supported product.

read the full Docker overview →

About terravision

TerraVision is a free, open source cloud architecture diagram generator for AWS, Azure and Google Cloud that works in both directions — from an AI prompt or Terraform code to a diagram, and from a diagram to Terraform — for cloud architects, platform engineers and infrastructure as code practitioners.

read the full terravision overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 88K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

kubernetes vs docker docker vs coolify docker vs dokploy docker vs casaos kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor

More Cloud Infrastructure Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Cloud Infrastructure Management field.

Docker vs kubernetes Docker vs kong Docker vs portainer Docker vs trivy Docker vs OpenTofu Docker vs jenkins Docker vs floci Docker vs Pulumi Docker vs argo-cd Docker vs sops Docker vs wtf Docker vs dagger

Frequently asked questions

Is Docker or terravision more popular?

Docker has 72,143 GitHub stars and terravision has 1,640. Docker has the larger community by that measure.

Are Docker and terravision free?

Both are open source. Docker is licensed under Apache-2.0 and terravision under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Docker and terravision?

Docker is written in Go and terravision in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Docker or terravision?

Choose Docker if you want the larger community (72,143 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose terravision if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.