head to head · open source
Docker vs infracost
Docker has 72,238 GitHub stars, 19,309 forks, 3,902 open issues and last shipped yesterday. infracost has 12,608 stars, 701 forks, 22 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Docker leads on adoption by 473% (72,238 vs 12,608 stars). Docker is written in Go under Apache-2.0; infracost is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Docker has attracted 27% as many forks as stars, infracost 6%. Docker was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Docker | infracost | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 72K | ★ 13K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Go | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-03 | 2026-11-03 |
| Forks | ⑂ 19K | ⑂ 701 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Docker if
- You weight community size — 72K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick infracost if
- You want the infracost feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and infracost fits your workflow better
About Docker
The Moby Project ================ Moby is an open source project created by Docker to enable and accelerate software containerization. It provides a "Lego set" of toolkit components, the framework for assembling them into custom container based systems, and a place for all container enthusiasts and professionals to experiment and exchange ideas. Components include container build tools, a container registry, orchestration tools, a runtime and more, and these can be used as building blocks in conjunction with other tools and projects. Principles Moby is an open project guided by strong principles, aiming to be…
read the full Docker overview →
About infracost
Cloud cost intelligence for engineers, AI coding agents, and CI/CD. Infracost shows cloud cost estimates and FinOps best practices for Terraform, Terragrunt, CloudFormation, and AWS CDK — before changes are deployed . See costs in your terminal, your editor, your AI coding agent, or right in pull requests. The Infracost Dev toolkit Infracost meets engineers wherever they work with infrastructure code — the terminal, their editor, their AI coding agent, and their CI pipeline. Every entry point talks to the same engine, the same pricing data, and the same FinOps policies, so a check you set up once shows up…
read the full infracost overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Cloud Infrastructure Management projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Cloud Infrastructure Management field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Docker or infracost more popular?
Docker has 72,238 GitHub stars and infracost has 12,608. Docker has the larger community by that measure.
Are Docker and infracost free?
Both are open source. Docker is licensed under Apache-2.0 and infracost under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Docker and infracost?
Docker is written in Go and infracost in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Docker or infracost?
Choose Docker if you want the larger community (72,238 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose infracost if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.