head to head · open source

Docker vs infracost

Docker has 72,113 GitHub stars, 19,233 forks, 3,902 open issues and last shipped yesterday. infracost has 12,526 stars, 686 forks, 22 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Docker leads on adoption by 476% (72,113 vs 12,526 stars). Docker is written in Go under Apache-2.0; infracost is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Docker has attracted 27% as many forks as stars, infracost 5%. Docker was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Docker ★ 72K infracost ★ 13K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Docker infracost
GitHub stars ★ 72K ★ 13K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 19K ⑂ 686
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Docker if

  • You weight community size — 72K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Docker profile →

pick infracost if

  • You want the infracost feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and infracost fits your workflow better

full infracost profile →

About Docker

Docker, published here as the Moby Project, is the open source collection of container toolkit components and the framework for assembling them into custom container based systems, built for engineers, integrators and enthusiasts who want to modify, hack and build on container code rather than buy a commercially supported product.

read the full Docker overview →

About infracost

Infracost is an open source cloud cost intelligence tool, written in Go and licensed Apache 2.0, that estimates cloud spend and enforces FinOps policies for Terraform, Terragrunt, CloudFormation and AWS CDK before changes are deployed — built for engineers, platform and DevOps teams, FinOps practitioners, and AI coding agents.

read the full infracost overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

kubernetes vs docker docker vs coolify docker vs dokploy docker vs casaos kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor

More Cloud Infrastructure Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Cloud Infrastructure Management field.

Docker vs kubernetes Docker vs kong Docker vs portainer Docker vs trivy Docker vs OpenTofu Docker vs jenkins Docker vs Pulumi Docker vs floci Docker vs argo-cd Docker vs sops Docker vs wtf Docker vs dagger

Frequently asked questions

Is Docker or infracost more popular?

Docker has 72,113 GitHub stars and infracost has 12,526. Docker has the larger community by that measure.

Are Docker and infracost free?

Both are open source. Docker is licensed under Apache-2.0 and infracost under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Docker and infracost?

Docker is written in Go and infracost in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Docker or infracost?

Choose Docker if you want the larger community (72,113 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose infracost if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.