head to head · open source

Docker vs bunkerweb

Docker has 72,113 GitHub stars, 19,233 forks, 3,902 open issues and last shipped yesterday. bunkerweb has 10,982 stars, 642 forks, 170 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Docker leads on adoption by 557% (72,113 vs 10,982 stars). Docker is written in Go under Apache-2.0; bunkerweb is written in Python under AGPL-3.0. Docker has attracted 27% as many forks as stars, bunkerweb 6%. Docker was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (docker), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Docker ★ 72K bunkerweb ★ 11K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Docker bunkerweb
GitHub stars ★ 72K ★ 11K
License Apache-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Go Python
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 19K ⑂ 642
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Docker if

  • You weight community size — 72K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Docker profile →

pick bunkerweb if

  • You want the bunkerweb feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and bunkerweb fits your workflow better

full bunkerweb profile →

About Docker

Docker, published here as the Moby Project, is the open source collection of container toolkit components and the framework for assembling them into custom container based systems, built for engineers, integrators and enthusiasts who want to modify, hack and build on container code rather than buy a commercially supported product.

read the full Docker overview →

About bunkerweb

BunkerWeb is a next generation, open source, cloud native Web Application Firewall built as a full featured web server on top of NGINX, designed to make web services secure by default, and it is aimed at teams running web services on Linux, Docker, Swarm, or Kubernetes who want protection in place as a reverse proxy rather than assembled by hand.

read the full bunkerweb overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

kubernetes vs docker docker vs coolify docker vs dokploy docker vs casaos kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor

More Cloud Infrastructure Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Cloud Infrastructure Management field.

Docker vs kubernetes Docker vs kong Docker vs portainer Docker vs trivy Docker vs OpenTofu Docker vs jenkins Docker vs Pulumi Docker vs floci Docker vs argo-cd Docker vs sops Docker vs wtf Docker vs dagger

Frequently asked questions

Is Docker or bunkerweb more popular?

Docker has 72,113 GitHub stars and bunkerweb has 10,982. Docker has the larger community by that measure.

Are Docker and bunkerweb free?

Both are open source. Docker is licensed under Apache-2.0 and bunkerweb under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Docker and bunkerweb?

Docker is written in Go and bunkerweb in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Docker or bunkerweb?

Choose Docker if you want the larger community (72,113 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose bunkerweb if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.