head to head · open source
dapr vs livecontext-ce
dapr has 26,169 GitHub stars, 2,173 forks, 452 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. livecontext-ce has 776 stars, 73 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 29 days ago. dapr leads on adoption by 3,272% (26,169 vs 776 stars). dapr is written in Go under Apache-2.0; livecontext-ce is written in Java under a custom or non-standard licence. dapr has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, livecontext-ce 9%. dapr was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai-agents), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| dapr | livecontext-ce | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 26K | ★ 776 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Custom / other |
| Written in | Go | Java |
| Last push | 2026-11-03 | 2026-10-07 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.2K | ⑂ 73 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick dapr if
- You weight community size — 26K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick livecontext-ce if
- You want the livecontext-ce feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You evaluated both and livecontext-ce fits your workflow better
About dapr
The runtime for durable execution, AI agents, and secure distributed applications [![Go Report][go report badge]][go report url] [![OpenSSF][openssf badge]][openssf url] [![Docker Pulls][docker badge]][docker url] [![Build Status][actions badge]][actions url] [![Test Status][e2e badge]][e2e url] [![Code Coverage][codecov badge]][codecov url] [![License: Apache 2.0][apache badge]][apache url] [![FOSSA Status][fossa badge]][fossa url] [![TODOs][todo badge]][todo url] [![Good First Issues][gfi badge]][gfi url] [![discord][discord badge]][discord url] [![YouTube][youtube badge]][youtube link] [![Bluesky][bluesky…
About livecontext-ce
LiveContext The AI automation platform. One message in, a working automation out. Describe the job in chat and LiveContext builds it in front of you: a workflow you can read, AI agents with scoped access and budgets you control, and a small app your team actually uses. Chat, Workflow, Agent and App in one self hosted platform. No code to write, nothing to stitch together. An open source, self hosted alternative to n8n, Zapier and Make, with AI agents built in. The builder, built by chat: one message in, a working automation out. Five real scenarios, one loop. Watch it full size · Try the hosted version ⭐…
read the full livecontext-ce overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Orchestration & Scheduling projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.
Frequently asked questions
Is dapr or livecontext-ce more popular?
dapr has 26,169 GitHub stars and livecontext-ce has 776. dapr has the larger community by that measure.
Are dapr and livecontext-ce free?
Both are open source. dapr is licensed under Apache-2.0, and livecontext-ce has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between dapr and livecontext-ce?
dapr is written in Go and livecontext-ce in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, dapr or livecontext-ce?
Choose dapr if you want the larger community (26,169 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose livecontext-ce if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.