head to head · open source
dapr vs lazycodex
dapr has 26,174 GitHub stars, 2,172 forks, 452 open issues and last shipped yesterday. lazycodex has 3,865 stars, 249 forks, 21 open issues and last shipped yesterday. dapr leads on adoption by 577% (26,174 vs 3,865 stars). dapr is written in Go under Apache-2.0; lazycodex is written in TypeScript under MIT. dapr has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, lazycodex 6%. dapr was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai-agents), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| dapr | lazycodex | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 26K | ★ 3.9K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Go | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.2K | ⑂ 249 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick dapr if
- You weight community size — 26K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick lazycodex if
- You want the lazycodex feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and lazycodex fits your workflow better
About dapr
The runtime for durable execution, AI agents, and secure distributed applications [![Go Report][go report badge]][go report url] [![OpenSSF][openssf badge]][openssf url] [![Docker Pulls][docker badge]][docker url] [![Build Status][actions badge]][actions url] [![Test Status][e2e badge]][e2e url] [![Code Coverage][codecov badge]][codecov url] [![License: Apache 2.0][apache badge]][apache url] [![FOSSA Status][fossa badge]][fossa url] [![TODOs][todo badge]][todo url] [![Good First Issues][gfi badge]][gfi url] [![discord][discord badge]][discord url] [![YouTube][youtube badge]][youtube link] [![Bluesky][bluesky…
About lazycodex
LazyCodex The one and only agent harness for complex codebases. Project memory, planning, execution, and verified completion inside Codex. What is this? · OmO · lazycodex.ai [!NOTE] [OmO] 60K Stars: the terrifying token burner has arrived in LazyCodex. Sisyphus Labs' OmO is the quality obsessed agent harness whose public lore says it loved Anthropic models hard enough to get third party clients blocked. Now that same OmO quality bar is available for Codex through LazyCodex. If you wanted OmO but did not want the setup ceremony, start here: Context: OmO 60K Stars on X 🚀 Install One line. No global install, no…
read the full lazycodex overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Orchestration & Scheduling projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.
Frequently asked questions
Is dapr or lazycodex more popular?
dapr has 26,174 GitHub stars and lazycodex has 3,865. dapr has the larger community by that measure.
Are dapr and lazycodex free?
Both are open source. dapr is licensed under Apache-2.0 and lazycodex under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between dapr and lazycodex?
dapr is written in Go and lazycodex in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, dapr or lazycodex?
Choose dapr if you want the larger community (26,174 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose lazycodex if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.