head to head · open source

Continue vs Grok Build

Continue has 35,946 GitHub stars, 5,395 forks, 951 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Grok Build has 26,820 stars, 5,048 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Continue leads on adoption by 34% (35,946 vs 26,820 stars). Continue is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; Grok Build is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. Continue has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, Grok Build 19%. Grok Build was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Continue ★ 36K Grok Build ★ 27K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Continue Grok Build
GitHub stars ★ 36K ★ 27K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Rust
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 5.4K ⑂ 5.0K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Continue if

  • You weight community size — 36K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Continue profile →

pick Grok Build if

  • You want the Grok Build feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and Grok Build fits your workflow better

full Grok Build profile →

About Continue

Continue is an open source coding agent designed to assist developers directly within their IDE or terminal. It operates as a CLI tool, VS Code extension, and JetBrains plugin, enabling natural language interaction with codebases to generate, edit, and explain code. The project lives in the AI assisted developer tools ecosystem and is built with TypeScript under the Apache 2.0 license.

read the full Continue overview →

About Grok Build

Grok Build is a terminal based AI coding agent developed by SpaceXAI, distributed as the grok CLI/TUI. It operates as a fullscreen, mouse interactive interface that integrates with the user’s codebase to perform code editing, command execution, web search, and long running task orchestration. The project lives in the Rust ecosystem and is licensed under Apache 2.0.

read the full Grok Build overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

opencode vs continue opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode langflow vs supabase langflow vs pocketbase langflow vs tooljet langflow vs appsmith langflow vs tiptap langflow vs directus langflow vs budibase langflow vs onlook

More AI Assisted Coding projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Assisted Coding field.

Continue vs OpenCode Continue vs pi Continue vs OpenHands Continue vs Paperclip Continue vs Orca Continue vs Cline Continue vs Aider Continue vs Tabby Continue vs T3 Code Continue vs Dyad Continue vs SWE-agent Continue vs Paseo

Frequently asked questions

Is Continue or Grok Build more popular?

Continue has 35,946 GitHub stars and Grok Build has 26,820. Continue has the larger community by that measure.

Are Continue and Grok Build free?

Both are open source. Continue is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Grok Build under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Continue and Grok Build?

Continue is written in TypeScript and Grok Build in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Continue or Grok Build?

Choose Continue if you want the larger community (35,946 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Grok Build if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.