head to head · open source
conductor vs uncloud
conductor has 32,401 GitHub stars, 1,051 forks, 253 open issues and last shipped yesterday. uncloud has 5,590 stars, 184 forks, 89 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. conductor leads on adoption by 480% (32,401 vs 5,590 stars). conductor is written in Java under Apache-2.0; uncloud is written in Go under Apache-2.0. conductor has attracted 3% as many forks as stars, uncloud 3%. conductor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| conductor | uncloud | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 5.6K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Java | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-29 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.1K | ⑂ 184 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick conductor if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick uncloud if
- You want the uncloud feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and uncloud fits your workflow better
About conductor
Conductor Durable Execution for Workflows and Agents Build agents that adapt. Run graphs that endure. Conductor is an open source durable execution platform for microservices, AI agents, and adaptive workflow graphs. It turns runtime choices—loops, branching, fan out, tool calls, approvals, retries, and cancellation—into durable, inspectable execution. It originated at Netflix and is actively maintained by Orkes and the community. Get Running in 60 Seconds Prerequisites: Node.js v16+ and Java 21+ must be installed. Open — your server is running with the built in ui next UI. Upgrading from a previous version? The…
read the full conductor overview →
About uncloud
▸ Deploy and scale containerised apps across servers without Swarm or Kubernetes overhead ◂ Uncloud is a lightweight clustering and container orchestration tool that lets you deploy and manage web apps across cloud VMs and bare metal with minimised cluster management overhead. It creates a secure WireGuard mesh network between your Docker hosts and provides automatic service discovery, load balancing, ingress with HTTPS, and simple CLI commands to manage your apps. Unlike traditional orchestrators, there's no central control plane and quorum to maintain. Each machine maintains a synchronised copy of the cluster…
read the full uncloud overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Orchestration & Scheduling projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.
Frequently asked questions
Is conductor or uncloud more popular?
conductor has 32,401 GitHub stars and uncloud has 5,590. conductor has the larger community by that measure.
Are conductor and uncloud free?
Both are open source. conductor is licensed under Apache-2.0 and uncloud under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between conductor and uncloud?
conductor is written in Java and uncloud in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, conductor or uncloud?
Choose conductor if you want the larger community (32,401 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose uncloud if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.