head to head · open source
conductor vs tugtainer
conductor has 32,207 GitHub stars, 1,009 forks, 253 open issues and last shipped today. tugtainer has 1,532 stars, 52 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. conductor leads on adoption by 2,002% (32,207 vs 1,532 stars). conductor is written in Java under Apache-2.0; tugtainer is written in Python under MIT. conductor has attracted 3% as many forks as stars, tugtainer 3%. conductor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| conductor | tugtainer | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 1.5K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Java | Python |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-12 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.0K | ⑂ 52 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick conductor if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick tugtainer if
- You want the tugtainer feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and tugtainer fits your workflow better
About conductor
Conductor is an Apache 2.0 licensed, event driven agentic workflow engine written in Java that provides durable and highly resilient execution for applications and AI agents, aimed at teams running microservices, AI agents, and adaptive workflow graphs that need orchestration they can version, inspect, and recover.
read the full conductor overview →
About tugtainer
Tugtainer is a self hosted app for automating updates of your docker containers Please be aware that the application is distributed as is and is not recommended for use in a production environment. And don't forget about regular backups of important data. Automatic updates are disabled by default. You can enable only what you need. Table of contents: main features deploy private registries custom labels notifications auth api env check and update healthcheck monitoring screenshots contributing security Main features: Web UI with authentication Multiple hosts support Socket proxy support Crontab scheduling Notific…
read the full tugtainer overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Orchestration & Scheduling projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.
Frequently asked questions
Is conductor or tugtainer more popular?
conductor has 32,207 GitHub stars and tugtainer has 1,532. conductor has the larger community by that measure.
Are conductor and tugtainer free?
Both are open source. conductor is licensed under Apache-2.0 and tugtainer under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between conductor and tugtainer?
conductor is written in Java and tugtainer in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, conductor or tugtainer?
Choose conductor if you want the larger community (32,207 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose tugtainer if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.