head to head · open source

conductor vs SpringBootUnity

conductor has 32,207 GitHub stars, 1,009 forks, 253 open issues and last shipped today. SpringBootUnity has 885 stars, 432 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. conductor leads on adoption by 3,539% (32,207 vs 885 stars). conductor is written in Java under Apache-2.0; SpringBootUnity is written in Java under MIT. conductor has attracted 3% as many forks as stars, SpringBootUnity 49%. conductor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (java, spring-boot), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

conductor ★ 32K SpringBootUnity ★ 885 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

conductor SpringBootUnity
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 885
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Java Java
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 1.0K ⑂ 432
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick conductor if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full conductor profile →

pick SpringBootUnity if

  • You want the SpringBootUnity feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and SpringBootUnity fits your workflow better

full SpringBootUnity profile →

About conductor

Conductor is an Apache 2.0 licensed, event driven agentic workflow engine written in Java that provides durable and highly resilient execution for applications and AI agents, aimed at teams running microservices, AI agents, and adaptive workflow graphs that need orchestration they can version, inspect, and recover.

read the full conductor overview →

About SpringBootUnity

SpringBootUnity 项目简介 需求是多变的。本项目以 Spring Boot 为基础,针对不同需求把不同的技术和 Spring Boot 搭配起来,每一种搭配单独做成一个模块,因此它是一个偏使用示例的集合而非一个完整产品。 每个模块都能独立打包、独立启动,互不影响,可以只挑自己关心的那一个跑起来看。如果你在使用 Spring Boot 的过程中有什么好用的技术,欢迎提 PR。 模块一览 一共 30 个模块。 core 是被其他模块共同依赖的基础包,其余每个模块各自演示一项技术。 除 socket 使用 8081 外,其余模块都监听 8080 ,所以一次只启动一个模块。 其中 validation 、 fileupload 、 restclient 、 cache 、 actuator 、 async 、 aop 、 httpinterface 、 i18n 、 ratelimit 、 graphql 、 kafka 、 mail 、 flyway 十四个模块附带可直接运行的测试。它们的测试都不依赖外部服务—— kafka 用内嵌 Kafka、 mail 用 GreenMail 内嵌 SMTP、 flyway 用内嵌 H2,其余用 Spring 测试上下文; mvn test 即可跑通,也可以当作各自技术点的可执行文档来读。 技术栈 Spring、Jackson、Hibernate、JUnit 等版本统一由 s…

read the full SpringBootUnity overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

compose vs conductor conductor vs xxl-job compose vs xxl-job compose vs gitleaks compose vs kestra compose vs haystack compose vs rancher compose vs prefect uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

conductor vs compose conductor vs xxl-job conductor vs gitleaks conductor vs Kestra conductor vs haystack conductor vs rancher conductor vs Prefect conductor vs Archon conductor vs Temporal conductor vs rowboat conductor vs Trigger conductor vs dolphinscheduler

Frequently asked questions

Is conductor or SpringBootUnity more popular?

conductor has 32,207 GitHub stars and SpringBootUnity has 885. conductor has the larger community by that measure.

Are conductor and SpringBootUnity free?

Both are open source. conductor is licensed under Apache-2.0 and SpringBootUnity under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between conductor and SpringBootUnity?

conductor is written in Java and SpringBootUnity in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, conductor or SpringBootUnity?

Choose conductor if you want the larger community (32,207 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose SpringBootUnity if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.