head to head · open source
conductor vs puppetry
conductor has 32,401 GitHub stars, 1,051 forks, 253 open issues and last shipped yesterday. puppetry has 888 stars, 127 forks, 25 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. conductor leads on adoption by 3,549% (32,401 vs 888 stars). conductor is written in Java under Apache-2.0; puppetry is written in JavaScript under MIT. conductor has attracted 3% as many forks as stars, puppetry 14%. conductor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| conductor | puppetry | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 888 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Java | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-06-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.1K | ⑂ 127 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick conductor if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick puppetry if
- You want the puppetry feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and puppetry fits your workflow better
About conductor
Conductor Durable Execution for Workflows and Agents Build agents that adapt. Run graphs that endure. Conductor is an open source durable execution platform for microservices, AI agents, and adaptive workflow graphs. It turns runtime choices—loops, branching, fan out, tool calls, approvals, retries, and cancellation—into durable, inspectable execution. It originated at Netflix and is actively maintained by Orkes and the community. Get Running in 60 Seconds Prerequisites: Node.js v16+ and Java 21+ must be installed. Open — your server is running with the built in ui next UI. Upgrading from a previous version? The…
read the full conductor overview →
About puppetry
Puppetry ⚠️ Project Deprecated After observing the market for many years since the last update, I’ve decided to officially deprecate Puppetry . Over time, it became clear that Playwright has evolved to cover almost everything I originally aimed to achieve with this project — and they do it much better. The idea of codeless end to end testing , while exciting at the time, has proven to be a technological dead end. Today, with the rise of AI assisted development , it’s possible to create robust end to end tests simply by narrating what you want to achieve — something that goes far beyond the original Puppetry…
read the full puppetry overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Orchestration & Scheduling projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.
Frequently asked questions
Is conductor or puppetry more popular?
conductor has 32,401 GitHub stars and puppetry has 888. conductor has the larger community by that measure.
Are conductor and puppetry free?
Both are open source. conductor is licensed under Apache-2.0 and puppetry under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between conductor and puppetry?
conductor is written in Java and puppetry in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, conductor or puppetry?
Choose conductor if you want the larger community (32,401 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose puppetry if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.