head to head · open source

conductor vs PatrowlManager

conductor has 32,207 GitHub stars, 1,009 forks, 253 open issues and last shipped yesterday. PatrowlManager has 639 stars, 111 forks, 257 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. conductor leads on adoption by 4,940% (32,207 vs 639 stars). conductor is written in Java under Apache-2.0; PatrowlManager is written in HTML under AGPL-3.0. conductor has attracted 3% as many forks as stars, PatrowlManager 17%. conductor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

conductor ★ 32K PatrowlManager ★ 639 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

conductor PatrowlManager
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 639
License Apache-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Java HTML
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-03-10
Forks ⑂ 1.0K ⑂ 111
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick conductor if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full conductor profile →

pick PatrowlManager if

  • You want the PatrowlManager feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches HTML
  • You evaluated both and PatrowlManager fits your workflow better

full PatrowlManager profile →

About conductor

Conductor is an Apache 2.0 licensed, event driven agentic workflow engine written in Java that provides durable and highly resilient execution for applications and AI agents, aimed at teams running microservices, AI agents, and adaptive workflow graphs that need orchestration they can version, inspect, and recover.

read the full conductor overview →

About PatrowlManager

PatrowlManager is the Django front end of PatrOwl, a free and open source platform for orchestrating security operations, built for security teams that need to manage assets, run scans through PatrowlEngines, aggregate the results, relay alerts to third parties, and produce reports and dashboards from one web interface and one JSON API.

read the full PatrowlManager overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

compose vs conductor n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack llama-index vs haystack compose vs xxl-job langgraph vs haystack compose vs gitleaks trivy vs gitleaks n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

conductor vs ansible conductor vs compose conductor vs xxl-job conductor vs gitleaks conductor vs Kestra conductor vs haystack conductor vs rancher conductor vs Prefect conductor vs Archon conductor vs Temporal conductor vs rowboat conductor vs Trigger

Frequently asked questions

Is conductor or PatrowlManager more popular?

conductor has 32,207 GitHub stars and PatrowlManager has 639. conductor has the larger community by that measure.

Are conductor and PatrowlManager free?

Both are open source. conductor is licensed under Apache-2.0 and PatrowlManager under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between conductor and PatrowlManager?

conductor is written in Java and PatrowlManager in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, conductor or PatrowlManager?

Choose conductor if you want the larger community (32,207 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose PatrowlManager if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.