head to head · open source
conductor vs optio
conductor has 32,401 GitHub stars, 1,051 forks, 253 open issues and last shipped yesterday. optio has 1,086 stars, 126 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped yesterday. conductor leads on adoption by 2,884% (32,401 vs 1,086 stars). conductor is written in Java under Apache-2.0; optio is written in TypeScript under MIT. conductor has attracted 3% as many forks as stars, optio 12%. conductor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| conductor | optio | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 1.1K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Java | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.1K | ⑂ 126 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick conductor if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick optio if
- You want the optio feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and optio fits your workflow better
About conductor
Conductor Durable Execution for Workflows and Agents Build agents that adapt. Run graphs that endure. Conductor is an open source durable execution platform for microservices, AI agents, and adaptive workflow graphs. It turns runtime choices—loops, branching, fan out, tool calls, approvals, retries, and cancellation—into durable, inspectable execution. It originated at Netflix and is actively maintained by Orkes and the community. Get Running in 60 Seconds Prerequisites: Node.js v16+ and Java 21+ must be installed. Open — your server is running with the built in ui next UI. Upgrading from a previous version? The…
read the full conductor overview →
About optio
Optio Self hosted AI engineering platform — your cluster, your agents, your code. Optio organizes agent work into three tiers, all driven by the same trigger types, prompt template engine, log streaming, and /api/tasks HTTP surface: Tasks (Repo Tasks) — turn tickets into merged pull requests. Submit a task (manually, from a GitHub Issue, Linear, Jira, or Notion), and Optio provisions an isolated environment, runs an AI agent, opens a PR, monitors CI, triggers code review, auto fixes failures, and merges when everything passes. Jobs (Standalone Tasks) — reusable, parameterized agent runs with no repo checkout…
read the full optio overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Orchestration & Scheduling projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.
Frequently asked questions
Is conductor or optio more popular?
conductor has 32,401 GitHub stars and optio has 1,086. conductor has the larger community by that measure.
Are conductor and optio free?
Both are open source. conductor is licensed under Apache-2.0 and optio under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between conductor and optio?
conductor is written in Java and optio in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, conductor or optio?
Choose conductor if you want the larger community (32,401 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose optio if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.