head to head · open source
conductor vs nuke
conductor has 32,207 GitHub stars, 1,009 forks, 253 open issues and last shipped today. nuke has 3,753 stars, 457 forks, 121 open issues and last shipped 10 months ago. conductor leads on adoption by 758% (32,207 vs 3,753 stars). conductor is written in Java under Apache-2.0; nuke is written in C# under MIT. conductor has attracted 3% as many forks as stars, nuke 12%. conductor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| conductor | nuke | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 3.8K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Java | C# |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2025-12-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.0K | ⑂ 457 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick conductor if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick nuke if
- You want the nuke feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches C#
- You evaluated both and nuke fits your workflow better
About conductor
Conductor is an Apache 2.0 licensed, event driven agentic workflow engine written in Java that provides durable and highly resilient execution for applications and AI agents, aimed at teams running microservices, AI agents, and adaptive workflow graphs that need orchestration they can version, inspect, and recover.
read the full conductor overview →
About nuke
The AKEless Build System for C /.NET Table of Contents Elevator Pitch Example Build Status Technology Sponsors Elevator Pitch Solid and scalable CI/CD pipelines are an essential pillar for being competitive and creating a great product. But why are most of us a little afraid of touching YAML files and don't even dare to look at build scripts? Much of this is because C developers are spoiled with a great language and smart IDEs, and they don't like missing their buddy for code completion, ease of debugging, refactorings, and code formatting. NUKE brings your build automation to an even level with every other .NET …
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Orchestration & Scheduling projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.
Frequently asked questions
Is conductor or nuke more popular?
conductor has 32,207 GitHub stars and nuke has 3,753. conductor has the larger community by that measure.
Are conductor and nuke free?
Both are open source. conductor is licensed under Apache-2.0 and nuke under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between conductor and nuke?
conductor is written in Java and nuke in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, conductor or nuke?
Choose conductor if you want the larger community (32,207 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose nuke if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.