head to head · open source

conductor vs moon

conductor has 32,401 GitHub stars, 1,051 forks, 253 open issues and last shipped yesterday. moon has 4,175 stars, 260 forks, 99 open issues and last shipped yesterday. conductor leads on adoption by 676% (32,401 vs 4,175 stars). conductor is written in Java under Apache-2.0; moon is written in Rust under MIT. conductor has attracted 3% as many forks as stars, moon 6%. conductor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (javascript), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

conductor ★ 32K moon ★ 4.2K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

conductor moon
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 4.2K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Java Rust
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 1.1K ⑂ 260
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick conductor if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full conductor profile →

pick moon if

  • You want the moon feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and moon fits your workflow better

full moon profile →

About conductor

Conductor Durable Execution for Workflows and Agents Build agents that adapt. Run graphs that endure. Conductor is an open source durable execution platform for microservices, AI agents, and adaptive workflow graphs. It turns runtime choices—loops, branching, fan out, tool calls, approvals, retries, and cancellation—into durable, inspectable execution. It originated at Netflix and is actively maintained by Orkes and the community. Get Running in 60 Seconds Prerequisites: Node.js v16+ and Java 21+ must be installed. Open — your server is running with the built in ui next UI. Upgrading from a previous version? The…

read the full conductor overview →

About moon

moon moon is a repository m anagement, o rganization, o rchestration, and n otification tool for the web ecosystem, written in Rust. Many of the concepts within moon are heavily inspired from Bazel and other popular build systems. Documentation Contributing Code of conduct Why use moon? Working in a developer ecosystem can be very involved, especially when it comes to managing a repository effectively. Which package manager to use? Which language version to use? How to import packages? How to build code? So on and so forth. moon aims to streamline this entire process and provide a first class developer…

read the full moon overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

Frequently asked questions

Is conductor or moon more popular?

conductor has 32,401 GitHub stars and moon has 4,175. conductor has the larger community by that measure.

Are conductor and moon free?

Both are open source. conductor is licensed under Apache-2.0 and moon under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between conductor and moon?

conductor is written in Java and moon in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, conductor or moon?

Choose conductor if you want the larger community (32,401 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose moon if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.