head to head · open source
conductor vs livecontext-ce
conductor has 32,213 GitHub stars, 1,012 forks, 253 open issues and last shipped yesterday. livecontext-ce has 502 stars, 59 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 12 days ago. conductor leads on adoption by 6,317% (32,213 vs 502 stars). conductor is written in Java under Apache-2.0; livecontext-ce is written in Java under AGPL-3.0. conductor has attracted 3% as many forks as stars, livecontext-ce 12%. conductor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 15422 open source comparisons
Side by side
| conductor | livecontext-ce | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 502 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Java | Java |
| Last push | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-08 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.0K | ⑂ 59 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick conductor if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick livecontext-ce if
- You want the livecontext-ce feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You evaluated both and livecontext-ce fits your workflow better
About conductor
Conductor is an Apache 2.0 licensed, event driven agentic workflow engine written in Java that provides durable and highly resilient execution for applications and AI agents, aimed at teams running microservices, AI agents, and adaptive workflow graphs that need orchestration they can version, inspect, and recover.
read the full conductor overview →
About livecontext-ce
LiveContext CE is the self hosted, AGPL 3.0 Community Edition of the LiveContext AI automation platform, a single Docker deployed service where a team describes a job in chat and gets back a readable workflow, scoped AI agents and a small app the team actually uses.
read the full livecontext-ce overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Orchestration & Scheduling projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.
Frequently asked questions
Is conductor or livecontext-ce more popular?
conductor has 32,213 GitHub stars and livecontext-ce has 502. conductor has the larger community by that measure.
Are conductor and livecontext-ce free?
Both are open source. conductor is licensed under Apache-2.0 and livecontext-ce under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between conductor and livecontext-ce?
conductor is written in Java and livecontext-ce in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, conductor or livecontext-ce?
Choose conductor if you want the larger community (32,213 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose livecontext-ce if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.