head to head · open source
conductor vs livecontext-ce
conductor has 32,409 GitHub stars, 1,054 forks, 253 open issues and last shipped yesterday. livecontext-ce has 776 stars, 73 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 28 days ago. conductor leads on adoption by 4,076% (32,409 vs 776 stars). conductor is written in Java under Apache-2.0; livecontext-ce is written in Java under a custom or non-standard licence. conductor has attracted 3% as many forks as stars, livecontext-ce 9%. conductor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| conductor | livecontext-ce | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 776 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Custom / other |
| Written in | Java | Java |
| Last push | 2026-11-03 | 2026-10-07 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.1K | ⑂ 73 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick conductor if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick livecontext-ce if
- You want the livecontext-ce feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You evaluated both and livecontext-ce fits your workflow better
About conductor
Conductor Durable Execution for Workflows and Agents Build agents that adapt. Run graphs that endure. Conductor is an open source durable execution platform for microservices, AI agents, and adaptive workflow graphs. It turns runtime choices—loops, branching, fan out, tool calls, approvals, retries, and cancellation—into durable, inspectable execution. It originated at Netflix and is actively maintained by Orkes and the community. Get Running in 60 Seconds Prerequisites: Node.js v16+ and Java 21+ must be installed. Open — your server is running with the built in ui next UI. Upgrading from a previous version? The…
read the full conductor overview →
About livecontext-ce
LiveContext The AI automation platform. One message in, a working automation out. Describe the job in chat and LiveContext builds it in front of you: a workflow you can read, AI agents with scoped access and budgets you control, and a small app your team actually uses. Chat, Workflow, Agent and App in one self hosted platform. No code to write, nothing to stitch together. An open source, self hosted alternative to n8n, Zapier and Make, with AI agents built in. The builder, built by chat: one message in, a working automation out. Five real scenarios, one loop. Watch it full size · Try the hosted version ⭐…
read the full livecontext-ce overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Orchestration & Scheduling projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.
Frequently asked questions
Is conductor or livecontext-ce more popular?
conductor has 32,409 GitHub stars and livecontext-ce has 776. conductor has the larger community by that measure.
Are conductor and livecontext-ce free?
Both are open source. conductor is licensed under Apache-2.0, and livecontext-ce has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between conductor and livecontext-ce?
conductor is written in Java and livecontext-ce in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, conductor or livecontext-ce?
Choose conductor if you want the larger community (32,409 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose livecontext-ce if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.