head to head · open source
conductor vs lazycodex
conductor has 32,207 GitHub stars, 1,009 forks, 253 open issues and last shipped today. lazycodex has 3,470 stars, 220 forks, 21 open issues and last shipped today. conductor leads on adoption by 828% (32,207 vs 3,470 stars). conductor is written in Java under Apache-2.0; lazycodex is written in TypeScript under MIT. conductor has attracted 3% as many forks as stars, lazycodex 6%. conductor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| conductor | lazycodex | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 3.5K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Java | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.0K | ⑂ 220 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick conductor if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick lazycodex if
- You want the lazycodex feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and lazycodex fits your workflow better
About conductor
Conductor is an Apache 2.0 licensed, event driven agentic workflow engine written in Java that provides durable and highly resilient execution for applications and AI agents, aimed at teams running microservices, AI agents, and adaptive workflow graphs that need orchestration they can version, inspect, and recover.
read the full conductor overview →
About lazycodex
LazyCodex The one and only agent harness for complex codebases. Project memory, planning, execution, and verified completion inside Codex. What is this? · OmO · lazycodex.ai [!NOTE] [OmO] 60K Stars: the terrifying token burner has arrived in LazyCodex. Sisyphus Labs' OmO is the quality obsessed agent harness whose public lore says it loved Anthropic models hard enough to get third party clients blocked. Now that same OmO quality bar is available for Codex through LazyCodex. If you wanted OmO but did not want the setup ceremony, start here: Context: OmO 60K Stars on X 🚀 Install One line. No global install, no npm…
read the full lazycodex overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Orchestration & Scheduling projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.
Frequently asked questions
Is conductor or lazycodex more popular?
conductor has 32,207 GitHub stars and lazycodex has 3,470. conductor has the larger community by that measure.
Are conductor and lazycodex free?
Both are open source. conductor is licensed under Apache-2.0 and lazycodex under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between conductor and lazycodex?
conductor is written in Java and lazycodex in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, conductor or lazycodex?
Choose conductor if you want the larger community (32,207 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose lazycodex if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.