head to head · open source
conductor vs jreleaser
conductor has 32,401 GitHub stars, 1,051 forks, 253 open issues and last shipped yesterday. jreleaser has 1,246 stars, 162 forks, 127 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. conductor leads on adoption by 2,500% (32,401 vs 1,246 stars). conductor is written in Java under Apache-2.0; jreleaser is written in Java under Apache-2.0. conductor has attracted 3% as many forks as stars, jreleaser 13%. conductor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (java), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| conductor | jreleaser | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 1.2K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Java | Java |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-31 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.1K | ⑂ 162 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick conductor if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick jreleaser if
- You want the jreleaser feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You evaluated both and jreleaser fits your workflow better
About conductor
Conductor Durable Execution for Workflows and Agents Build agents that adapt. Run graphs that endure. Conductor is an open source durable execution platform for microservices, AI agents, and adaptive workflow graphs. It turns runtime choices—loops, branching, fan out, tool calls, approvals, retries, and cancellation—into durable, inspectable execution. It originated at Netflix and is actively maintained by Orkes and the community. Get Running in 60 Seconds Prerequisites: Node.js v16+ and Java 21+ must be installed. Open — your server is running with the built in ui next UI. Upgrading from a previous version? The…
read the full conductor overview →
About jreleaser
:linkattrs: :project owner: jreleaser :project name: jreleaser :project group: org.jreleaser :project artifactId: jreleaser model api :project version: 1.26.0 :plugin path: org/jreleaser :plugin id: org.jreleaser image::src/media/banner.png[JReleaser] Release Java and non Java projects quickly and easily with link: JReleaser is a release automation tool for Java and non Java projects (Go, Rust, Elixir, C , etc). Its goal is to simplify creating releases and publishing artifacts to multiple package managers while providing customizable options. For questions, support and general discussion, please use link…
read the full jreleaser overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Orchestration & Scheduling projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.
Frequently asked questions
Is conductor or jreleaser more popular?
conductor has 32,401 GitHub stars and jreleaser has 1,246. conductor has the larger community by that measure.
Are conductor and jreleaser free?
Both are open source. conductor is licensed under Apache-2.0 and jreleaser under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between conductor and jreleaser?
conductor is written in Java and jreleaser in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, conductor or jreleaser?
Choose conductor if you want the larger community (32,401 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose jreleaser if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.