head to head · open source
conductor vs jenkins-library
conductor has 32,404 GitHub stars, 1,050 forks, 253 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. jenkins-library has 822 stars, 641 forks, 34 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. conductor leads on adoption by 3,842% (32,404 vs 822 stars). conductor is written in Java under Apache-2.0; jenkins-library is written in Go under Apache-2.0. conductor has attracted 3% as many forks as stars, jenkins-library 78%. conductor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| conductor | jenkins-library | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 822 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Java | Go |
| Last push | 2026-10-31 | 2026-10-30 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.1K | ⑂ 641 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick conductor if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick jenkins-library if
- You want the jenkins-library feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and jenkins-library fits your workflow better
About conductor
Conductor Durable Execution for Workflows and Agents Build agents that adapt. Run graphs that endure. Conductor is an open source durable execution platform for microservices, AI agents, and adaptive workflow graphs. It turns runtime choices—loops, branching, fan out, tool calls, approvals, retries, and cancellation—into durable, inspectable execution. It originated at Netflix and is actively maintained by Orkes and the community. Get Running in 60 Seconds Prerequisites: Node.js v16+ and Java 21+ must be installed. Open — your server is running with the built in ui next UI. Upgrading from a previous version? The…
read the full conductor overview →
About jenkins-library
⚠️ Repository Archive Notice This repository will be archived on December 31, 2026. What This Means This repository will no longer be actively maintained after the archive date The repository will remain available in read only mode for reference No further updates, bug fixes, or pull requests will be accepted after December 31, 2026 For SAP Internal Teams If you're an SAP internal development team using Piper through internal platforms, you are not affected by this change. Your access and support will continue uninterrupted. Please reach out through your internal support channels for any questions. For External…
read the full jenkins-library overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Orchestration & Scheduling projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.
Frequently asked questions
Is conductor or jenkins-library more popular?
conductor has 32,404 GitHub stars and jenkins-library has 822. conductor has the larger community by that measure.
Are conductor and jenkins-library free?
Both are open source. conductor is licensed under Apache-2.0 and jenkins-library under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between conductor and jenkins-library?
conductor is written in Java and jenkins-library in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, conductor or jenkins-library?
Choose conductor if you want the larger community (32,404 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose jenkins-library if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.