head to head · open source

conductor vs FluentScheduler

conductor has 32,207 GitHub stars, 1,010 forks, 253 open issues and last shipped yesterday. FluentScheduler has 2,768 stars, 410 forks, 21 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. conductor leads on adoption by 1,064% (32,207 vs 2,768 stars). conductor is written in Java under Apache-2.0; FluentScheduler is written in C# under Unlicense. conductor has attracted 3% as many forks as stars, FluentScheduler 15%. conductor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

conductor ★ 32K FluentScheduler ★ 2.8K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

conductor FluentScheduler
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 2.8K
License Apache-2.0 Unlicense
Written in Java C#
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-03-19
Forks ⑂ 1.0K ⑂ 410
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick conductor if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full conductor profile →

pick FluentScheduler if

  • You want the FluentScheduler feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Unlicense license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and FluentScheduler fits your workflow better

full FluentScheduler profile →

About conductor

Conductor is an Apache 2.0 licensed, event driven agentic workflow engine written in Java that provides durable and highly resilient execution for applications and AI agents, aimed at teams running microservices, AI agents, and adaptive workflow graphs that need orchestration they can version, inspect, and recover.

read the full conductor overview →

About FluentScheduler

FluentScheduler is automated job scheduler with fluent interface for .NET platform. Repository facts list language as C , license as Unlicense, category as Infrastructure & Operations / Orchestration & Scheduling, topics as fluent and scheduler, stars as 2767, forks as 410, age as 14 years, last push as 2026 03 19T02:17:27Z, and open issues as 21. README shows C program creating Schedule object, passing console output action, configuring run callback with Every(5).Minutes(), then calling Start.

read the full FluentScheduler overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

compose vs conductor conductor vs xxl-job compose vs xxl-job compose vs gitleaks compose vs kestra compose vs haystack compose vs rancher compose vs prefect uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

conductor vs compose conductor vs xxl-job conductor vs gitleaks conductor vs Kestra conductor vs haystack conductor vs rancher conductor vs Prefect conductor vs Archon conductor vs Temporal conductor vs rowboat conductor vs Trigger conductor vs dolphinscheduler

Frequently asked questions

Is conductor or FluentScheduler more popular?

conductor has 32,207 GitHub stars and FluentScheduler has 2,768. conductor has the larger community by that measure.

Are conductor and FluentScheduler free?

Both are open source. conductor is licensed under Apache-2.0 and FluentScheduler under Unlicense. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between conductor and FluentScheduler?

conductor is written in Java and FluentScheduler in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, conductor or FluentScheduler?

Choose conductor if you want the larger community (32,207 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose FluentScheduler if its feature set, stack or Unlicense licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.