head to head · open source

conductor vs dtm

conductor has 32,207 GitHub stars, 1,010 forks, 253 open issues and last shipped yesterday. dtm has 10,918 stars, 997 forks, 87 open issues and last shipped 9 months ago. conductor leads on adoption by 195% (32,207 vs 10,918 stars). conductor is written in Java under Apache-2.0; dtm is written in Go under BSD-3-Clause. conductor has attracted 3% as many forks as stars, dtm 9%. conductor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (java), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

conductor ★ 32K dtm ★ 11K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

conductor dtm
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 11K
License Apache-2.0 BSD-3-Clause
Written in Java Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-01-03
Forks ⑂ 1.0K ⑂ 997
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick conductor if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full conductor profile →

pick dtm if

  • You want the dtm feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and dtm fits your workflow better

full dtm profile →

About conductor

Conductor is an Apache 2.0 licensed, event driven agentic workflow engine written in Java that provides durable and highly resilient execution for applications and AI agents, aimed at teams running microservices, AI agents, and adaptive workflow graphs that need orchestration they can version, inspect, and recover.

read the full conductor overview →

About dtm

DTM is a distributed transaction framework that provides cross service eventual data consistency for microservices, with saga, TCC, XA, 2 phase message, outbox, and workflow patterns plus SDKs for Go, Java, PHP, C , Python, and Node.js.

read the full dtm overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

compose vs conductor conductor vs xxl-job compose vs xxl-job compose vs gitleaks compose vs kestra compose vs haystack compose vs rancher compose vs prefect uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

conductor vs compose conductor vs xxl-job conductor vs gitleaks conductor vs Kestra conductor vs haystack conductor vs rancher conductor vs Prefect conductor vs Archon conductor vs Temporal conductor vs rowboat conductor vs Trigger conductor vs dolphinscheduler

Frequently asked questions

Is conductor or dtm more popular?

conductor has 32,207 GitHub stars and dtm has 10,918. conductor has the larger community by that measure.

Are conductor and dtm free?

Both are open source. conductor is licensed under Apache-2.0 and dtm under BSD-3-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between conductor and dtm?

conductor is written in Java and dtm in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, conductor or dtm?

Choose conductor if you want the larger community (32,207 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose dtm if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.