head to head · open source
conductor vs dmux
conductor has 32,404 GitHub stars, 1,050 forks, 253 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. dmux has 1,814 stars, 138 forks, 39 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. conductor leads on adoption by 1,686% (32,404 vs 1,814 stars). conductor is written in Java under Apache-2.0; dmux is written in HTML under MIT. conductor has attracted 3% as many forks as stars, dmux 8%. conductor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| conductor | dmux | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 1.8K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Java | HTML |
| Last push | 2026-10-31 | 2026-08-16 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.1K | ⑂ 138 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick conductor if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick dmux if
- You want the dmux feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches HTML
- You evaluated both and dmux fits your workflow better
About conductor
Conductor Durable Execution for Workflows and Agents Build agents that adapt. Run graphs that endure. Conductor is an open source durable execution platform for microservices, AI agents, and adaptive workflow graphs. It turns runtime choices—loops, branching, fan out, tool calls, approvals, retries, and cancellation—into durable, inspectable execution. It originated at Netflix and is actively maintained by Orkes and the community. Get Running in 60 Seconds Prerequisites: Node.js v16+ and Java 21+ must be installed. Open — your server is running with the built in ui next UI. Upgrading from a previous version? The…
read the full conductor overview →
About dmux
Parallel agents with tmux and worktrees Manage multiple AI coding agents in isolated git worktrees. Branch, develop, and merge — all in parallel. Documentation · Getting Started · Issues Language: English 日本語 Install Quick Start Press n to create a new pane, type a prompt, pick one or more agents (or none for a plain terminal), and dmux handles the rest — worktree, branch, and agent launch. On first run, dmux can configure a primary inference provider/model and an optional backup. It discovers models from the provider when possible and supports API key providers, custom OpenAI…
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Orchestration & Scheduling projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.
Frequently asked questions
Is conductor or dmux more popular?
conductor has 32,404 GitHub stars and dmux has 1,814. conductor has the larger community by that measure.
Are conductor and dmux free?
Both are open source. conductor is licensed under Apache-2.0 and dmux under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between conductor and dmux?
conductor is written in Java and dmux in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, conductor or dmux?
Choose conductor if you want the larger community (32,404 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose dmux if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.