head to head · open source

conductor vs dbos-transact-golang

conductor has 32,207 GitHub stars, 1,009 forks, 253 open issues and last shipped today. dbos-transact-golang has 833 stars, 73 forks, 10 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. conductor leads on adoption by 3,766% (32,207 vs 833 stars). conductor is written in Java under Apache-2.0; dbos-transact-golang is written in Go under MIT. conductor has attracted 3% as many forks as stars, dbos-transact-golang 9%. conductor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 4 topic tags (durable-execution, orchestration-engine, workflow-automation, workflow-engine), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

conductor ★ 32K dbos-transact-golang ★ 833 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

conductor dbos-transact-golang
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 833
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Java Go
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 1.0K ⑂ 73
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick conductor if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full conductor profile →

pick dbos-transact-golang if

  • You want the dbos-transact-golang feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and dbos-transact-golang fits your workflow better

full dbos-transact-golang profile →

About conductor

Conductor is an Apache 2.0 licensed, event driven agentic workflow engine written in Java that provides durable and highly resilient execution for applications and AI agents, aimed at teams running microservices, AI agents, and adaptive workflow graphs that need orchestration they can version, inspect, and recover.

read the full conductor overview →

About dbos-transact-golang

DBOS Transact: Lightweight Durable Workflow Orchestration with Postgres Documentation • Examples • Github What is DBOS? DBOS provides lightweight durable workflow orchestration on top of Postgres. Instead of managing your own workflow orchestrator or task queue system, you can use DBOS to add durable workflows and queues to your program in just a few lines of code. When Should I Use DBOS? You should consider using DBOS if your application needs to reliably handle failures . For example, you might be building a payments service that must reliably process transactions even if servers crash mid operation, or a long …

read the full dbos-transact-golang overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

compose vs conductor conductor vs xxl-job compose vs xxl-job compose vs gitleaks compose vs kestra compose vs haystack compose vs rancher compose vs prefect uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

conductor vs compose conductor vs xxl-job conductor vs gitleaks conductor vs Kestra conductor vs haystack conductor vs rancher conductor vs Prefect conductor vs Archon conductor vs Temporal conductor vs rowboat conductor vs Trigger conductor vs dolphinscheduler

Frequently asked questions

Is conductor or dbos-transact-golang more popular?

conductor has 32,207 GitHub stars and dbos-transact-golang has 833. conductor has the larger community by that measure.

Are conductor and dbos-transact-golang free?

Both are open source. conductor is licensed under Apache-2.0 and dbos-transact-golang under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between conductor and dbos-transact-golang?

conductor is written in Java and dbos-transact-golang in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, conductor or dbos-transact-golang?

Choose conductor if you want the larger community (32,207 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose dbos-transact-golang if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.