head to head · open source
conductor vs chart-releaser-action
conductor has 32,401 GitHub stars, 1,051 forks, 253 open issues and last shipped yesterday. chart-releaser-action has 667 stars, 222 forks, 79 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. conductor leads on adoption by 4,758% (32,401 vs 667 stars). conductor is written in Java under Apache-2.0; chart-releaser-action is written in Shell under Apache-2.0. conductor has attracted 3% as many forks as stars, chart-releaser-action 33%. conductor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| conductor | chart-releaser-action | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 667 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Java | Shell |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.1K | ⑂ 222 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick conductor if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick chart-releaser-action if
- You want the chart-releaser-action feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Shell
- You evaluated both and chart-releaser-action fits your workflow better
About conductor
Conductor Durable Execution for Workflows and Agents Build agents that adapt. Run graphs that endure. Conductor is an open source durable execution platform for microservices, AI agents, and adaptive workflow graphs. It turns runtime choices—loops, branching, fan out, tool calls, approvals, retries, and cancellation—into durable, inspectable execution. It originated at Netflix and is actively maintained by Orkes and the community. Get Running in 60 Seconds Prerequisites: Node.js v16+ and Java 21+ must be installed. Open — your server is running with the built in ui next UI. Upgrading from a previous version? The…
read the full conductor overview →
About chart-releaser-action
chart releaser Action A GitHub action to turn a GitHub project into a self hosted Helm chart repo, using helm/chart releaser CLI tool. Usage Pre requisites 1. A GitHub repo containing a directory with your Helm charts (default is a folder named /charts , if you want to maintain your charts in a different directory, you must include a charts dir input in the workflow). 1. A GitHub branch called gh pages to store the published charts. 1. In your repo, go to Settings/Pages. Change the Source Branch to gh pages . 1. Create a workflow .yml file in your .github/workflows directory. An example workflow is available…
read the full chart-releaser-action overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Orchestration & Scheduling projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.
Frequently asked questions
Is conductor or chart-releaser-action more popular?
conductor has 32,401 GitHub stars and chart-releaser-action has 667. conductor has the larger community by that measure.
Are conductor and chart-releaser-action free?
Both are open source. conductor is licensed under Apache-2.0 and chart-releaser-action under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between conductor and chart-releaser-action?
conductor is written in Java and chart-releaser-action in Shell. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, conductor or chart-releaser-action?
Choose conductor if you want the larger community (32,401 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose chart-releaser-action if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.