head to head · open source
conductor vs bisheng
conductor has 32,207 GitHub stars, 1,010 forks, 253 open issues and last shipped yesterday. bisheng has 11,978 stars, 1,969 forks, 138 open issues and last shipped yesterday. conductor leads on adoption by 169% (32,207 vs 11,978 stars). conductor is written in Java under Apache-2.0; bisheng is written in Python under Apache-2.0. conductor has attracted 3% as many forks as stars, bisheng 16%. conductor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| conductor | bisheng | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 12K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Java | Python |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.0K | ⑂ 2.0K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick conductor if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick bisheng if
- You want the bisheng feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and bisheng fits your workflow better
About conductor
Conductor is an Apache 2.0 licensed, event driven agentic workflow engine written in Java that provides durable and highly resilient execution for applications and AI agents, aimed at teams running microservices, AI agents, and adaptive workflow graphs that need orchestration they can version, inspect, and recover.
read the full conductor overview →
About bisheng
BISHENG is an open source LLM DevOps platform, licensed under Apache 2.0, for building and operating next generation enterprise AI applications, and it is aimed at organisations that need GenAI workflows, RAG, agents, and model management to run inside their own infrastructure.
read the full bisheng overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Orchestration & Scheduling projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.
Frequently asked questions
Is conductor or bisheng more popular?
conductor has 32,207 GitHub stars and bisheng has 11,978. conductor has the larger community by that measure.
Are conductor and bisheng free?
Both are open source. conductor is licensed under Apache-2.0 and bisheng under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between conductor and bisheng?
conductor is written in Java and bisheng in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, conductor or bisheng?
Choose conductor if you want the larger community (32,207 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose bisheng if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.