head to head · open source
conductor vs agola
conductor has 32,207 GitHub stars, 1,010 forks, 253 open issues and last shipped yesterday. agola has 1,622 stars, 122 forks, 71 open issues and last shipped 12 months ago. conductor leads on adoption by 1,886% (32,207 vs 1,622 stars). conductor is written in Java under Apache-2.0; agola is written in Go under Apache-2.0. conductor has attracted 3% as many forks as stars, agola 8%. conductor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| conductor | agola | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 1.6K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Java | Go |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2025-09-24 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.0K | ⑂ 122 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick conductor if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick agola if
- You want the agola feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and agola fits your workflow better
About conductor
Conductor is an Apache 2.0 licensed, event driven agentic workflow engine written in Java that provides durable and highly resilient execution for applications and AI agents, aimed at teams running microservices, AI agents, and adaptive workflow graphs that need orchestration they can version, inspect, and recover.
read the full conductor overview →
About agola
Agola is an open source CI/CD platform written in Go and released under Apache 2.0. It lives in the DevOps ecosystem, where teams need continuous integration, delivery, and deployment pipelines for Git repositories and containerized execution environments.
read the full agola overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Orchestration & Scheduling projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.
Frequently asked questions
Is conductor or agola more popular?
conductor has 32,207 GitHub stars and agola has 1,622. conductor has the larger community by that measure.
Are conductor and agola free?
Both are open source. conductor is licensed under Apache-2.0 and agola under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between conductor and agola?
conductor is written in Java and agola in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, conductor or agola?
Choose conductor if you want the larger community (32,207 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose agola if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.