head to head · open source
conductor vs agent-swarm
conductor has 32,207 GitHub stars, 1,009 forks, 253 open issues and last shipped yesterday. agent-swarm has 807 stars, 104 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped yesterday. conductor leads on adoption by 3,891% (32,207 vs 807 stars). conductor is written in Java under Apache-2.0; agent-swarm is written in TypeScript under MIT. conductor has attracted 3% as many forks as stars, agent-swarm 13%. agent-swarm was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 13541 open source comparisons
Side by side
| conductor | agent-swarm | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 807 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Java | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.0K | ⑂ 104 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick conductor if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick agent-swarm if
- You want the agent-swarm feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and agent-swarm fits your workflow better
About conductor
Conductor is an Apache 2.0 licensed, event driven agentic workflow engine written in Java that provides durable and highly resilient execution for applications and AI agents, aimed at teams running microservices, AI agents, and adaptive workflow graphs that need orchestration they can version, inspect, and recover.
read the full conductor overview →
About agent-swarm
Agent Swarm is an MIT licensed, self hosted orchestration engine that runs a lead agent delegating goals to worker agents inside isolated Docker containers, built for teams that want their company to become AI native while keeping the work on their own infrastructure.
read the full agent-swarm overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Orchestration & Scheduling projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.
Frequently asked questions
Is conductor or agent-swarm more popular?
conductor has 32,207 GitHub stars and agent-swarm has 807. conductor has the larger community by that measure.
Are conductor and agent-swarm free?
Both are open source. conductor is licensed under Apache-2.0 and agent-swarm under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between conductor and agent-swarm?
conductor is written in Java and agent-swarm in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, conductor or agent-swarm?
Choose conductor if you want the larger community (32,207 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose agent-swarm if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.