head to head · open source

composio vs Hexabot

composio has 30,291 GitHub stars, 4,816 forks, 88 open issues and last shipped today. Hexabot has 1,242 stars, 241 forks, 26 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. composio leads on adoption by 2,339% (30,291 vs 1,242 stars). composio is written in TypeScript under MIT; Hexabot is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence. composio has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, Hexabot 19%. composio was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (agents, ai), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

composio ★ 30K Hexabot ★ 1.2K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

composio Hexabot
GitHub stars ★ 30K ★ 1.2K
License MIT Custom / other
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-23 2026-08-24
Forks ⑂ 4.8K ⑂ 241
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick composio if

  • You weight community size — 30K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full composio profile →

pick Hexabot if

  • You want the Hexabot feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Hexabot fits your workflow better

full Hexabot profile →

About composio

Composio is an MIT licensed agent toolkit platform, distributed as TypeScript and Python SDKs, that gives AI agents more than 1,000 pre authenticated toolkits, per user sessions, authentication, triggers, and a sandbox for turning intent into action across real applications.

read the full composio overview →

About Hexabot

Hexabot is a self hosted TypeScript automation platform that builds and runs AI agents and agentic workflows across conversational channels, aimed at developers and teams who want agentic automation running on their own infrastructure rather than on a vendor hosted service.

read the full Hexabot overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 266K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 111K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

composio vs ECC composio vs react composio vs Langflow composio vs Supabase composio vs puppeteer composio vs archify composio vs PocketBase composio vs i-have-adhd composio vs codebase-memory-mcp composio vs ToolJet composio vs AppSmith composio vs it-tools

Frequently asked questions

Is composio or Hexabot more popular?

composio has 30,291 GitHub stars and Hexabot has 1,242. composio has the larger community by that measure.

Are composio and Hexabot free?

Both are open source. composio is licensed under MIT, and Hexabot has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between composio and Hexabot?

composio is written in TypeScript and Hexabot in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, composio or Hexabot?

Choose composio if you want the larger community (30,291 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Hexabot if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.