head to head · open source

archify vs composio

archify has 70,075 GitHub stars, 4,710 forks, 134 open issues and last shipped today. composio has 30,291 stars, 4,816 forks, 88 open issues and last shipped today. archify leads on adoption by 131% (70,075 vs 30,291 stars). archify is written in JavaScript under MIT; composio is written in TypeScript under MIT. archify has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, composio 16%. archify was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (developer-tools), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

archify ★ 70K composio ★ 30K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

archify composio
GitHub stars ★ 70K ★ 30K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-23 2026-09-23
Forks ⑂ 4.7K ⑂ 4.8K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick archify if

  • You weight community size — 70K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full archify profile →

pick composio if

  • You want the composio feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and composio fits your workflow better

full composio profile →

About archify

Archify is an MIT licensed agent skill and Node.js rendering and validation system that turns a codebase or a written system description into a polished, interactive, self contained HTML system map, and it is built for developers and platform teams working inside coding agents such as Cursor, Claude Code, Codex CLI, and OpenCode.

read the full archify overview →

About composio

Composio is an MIT licensed agent toolkit platform, distributed as TypeScript and Python SDKs, that gives AI agents more than 1,000 pre authenticated toolkits, per user sessions, authentication, triggers, and a sandbox for turning intent into action across real applications.

read the full composio overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 266K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 111K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

archify vs ECC archify vs react archify vs Langflow archify vs Supabase archify vs puppeteer archify vs PocketBase archify vs i-have-adhd archify vs codebase-memory-mcp archify vs ToolJet archify vs AppSmith archify vs it-tools archify vs herdr

Frequently asked questions

Is archify or composio more popular?

archify has 70,075 GitHub stars and composio has 30,291. archify has the larger community by that measure.

Are archify and composio free?

Both are open source. archify is licensed under MIT and composio under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between archify and composio?

archify is written in JavaScript and composio in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, archify or composio?

Choose archify if you want the larger community (70,075 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose composio if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.