head to head · open source

ToolJet vs composio

ToolJet has 40,976 GitHub stars, 5,452 forks, 1,204 open issues and last shipped today. composio has 30,291 stars, 4,816 forks, 88 open issues and last shipped today. ToolJet leads on adoption by 35% (40,976 vs 30,291 stars). ToolJet is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0; composio is written in TypeScript under MIT. ToolJet has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, composio 16%. ToolJet was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (javascript), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ToolJet ★ 41K composio ★ 30K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ToolJet composio
GitHub stars ★ 41K ★ 30K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-23 2026-09-23
Forks ⑂ 5.5K ⑂ 4.8K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ToolJet if

  • You weight community size — 41K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ToolJet profile →

pick composio if

  • You want the composio feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and composio fits your workflow better

full composio profile →

About ToolJet

ToolJet is an open source low code platform for building internal tools—admin panels, dashboards, and operational applications—by connecting to existing databases, APIs, and SaaS systems. It lives in the JavaScript ecosystem and is licensed under AGPL 3.0.

read the full ToolJet overview →

About composio

Composio is an MIT licensed agent toolkit platform, distributed as TypeScript and Python SDKs, that gives AI agents more than 1,000 pre authenticated toolkits, per user sessions, authentication, triggers, and a sandbox for turning intent into action across real applications.

read the full composio overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 266K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 111K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

ToolJet vs ECC ToolJet vs react ToolJet vs Langflow ToolJet vs Supabase ToolJet vs puppeteer ToolJet vs archify ToolJet vs PocketBase ToolJet vs i-have-adhd ToolJet vs codebase-memory-mcp ToolJet vs AppSmith ToolJet vs it-tools ToolJet vs herdr

Frequently asked questions

Is ToolJet or composio more popular?

ToolJet has 40,976 GitHub stars and composio has 30,291. ToolJet has the larger community by that measure.

Are ToolJet and composio free?

Both are open source. ToolJet is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and composio under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ToolJet and composio?

ToolJet is written in JavaScript and composio in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ToolJet or composio?

Choose ToolJet if you want the larger community (40,976 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose composio if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.