head to head · open source
codex-security vs vArmor
codex-security has 10,757 GitHub stars, 797 forks, 220 open issues and last shipped today. vArmor has 501 stars, 68 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped yesterday. codex-security leads on adoption by 2,047% (10,757 vs 501 stars). codex-security is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; vArmor is written in Go under Apache-2.0. codex-security has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, vArmor 14%. codex-security was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai-security), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| codex-security | vArmor | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 11K | ★ 501 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 797 | ⑂ 68 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick codex-security if
- You weight community size — 11K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick vArmor if
- You want the vArmor feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and vArmor fits your workflow better
About codex-security
Codex Security is OpenAI's command line tool and TypeScript SDK, published on npm as @openai/codex security , that finds, validates, and fixes security vulnerabilities in a codebase, and it serves application security engineers, DevSecOps teams, and developers who want that scanning to run from their own terminal or CI.
read the full codex-security overview →
About vArmor
English 简体中文 日本語 vArmor is a cloud native container hardening system. It leverages Linux's AppArmor LSM, BPF LSM, Seccomp, and Network Proxy (Envoy based sidecar) technologies to implement enforcers. It can be used to strengthen container isolation, reduce the kernel attack surface, enforce network egress access control at L4/L7 levels — including TLS MITM for decrypted HTTPS inspection, HTTP header injection, and anti Domain Fronting protection — and increase the difficulty and cost of container escape or lateral movement attacks. You can leverage vArmor in the following scenarios to provide sandbox protection f…
read the full vArmor overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Security & Privacy projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.
Frequently asked questions
Is codex-security or vArmor more popular?
codex-security has 10,757 GitHub stars and vArmor has 501. codex-security has the larger community by that measure.
Are codex-security and vArmor free?
Both are open source. codex-security is licensed under Apache-2.0 and vArmor under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between codex-security and vArmor?
codex-security is written in TypeScript and vArmor in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, codex-security or vArmor?
Choose codex-security if you want the larger community (10,757 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose vArmor if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.