head to head · open source
codex-security vs Agentic-Bug-Hunter
codex-security has 11,287 GitHub stars, 903 forks, 220 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Agentic-Bug-Hunter has 5,547 stars, 978 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. codex-security leads on adoption by 103% (11,287 vs 5,547 stars). codex-security is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; Agentic-Bug-Hunter is written in Python under MIT. codex-security has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, Agentic-Bug-Hunter 18%. codex-security was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai-security), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| codex-security | Agentic-Bug-Hunter | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 11K | ★ 5.5K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-28 |
| Forks | ⑂ 903 | ⑂ 978 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick codex-security if
- You weight community size — 11K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Agentic-Bug-Hunter if
- You want the Agentic-Bug-Hunter feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and Agentic-Bug-Hunter fits your workflow better
About codex-security
Codex Security @openai/codex security is a CLI and TypeScript SDK for defining security policy and finding, validating, and fixing security vulnerabilities in your code. 👉👉 See the Codex Security documentation for full documentation. Some cybersecurity requests and protected findings require approval through Trusted Access for Cyber. To join the program, visit chatgpt.com/cyber. Quick start Requires Node.js 22.13.0 or later and Python 3.10 or later. For CI, set OPENAI API KEY instead of signing in. Generate SECURITY.md Draft repository wide or component scoped SECURITY.md guidance for future scans: The command…
read the full codex-security overview →
About Agentic-Bug-Hunter
AI powered bug bounty hunting recon to report, in your terminal. Free Setup · Quick Start · Commands · What It Finds · Install · Support · FAQ Built and maintained by AwareXone · Website · X · GitHub Trusted By Engineers At Where this project's stargazers say they work. Compiled from public GitHub profiles of this repository's stargazers 43 people across 30 organizations, counted from the employer each person lists on their own profile or from their public organization memberships. No individual accounts are named. These companies have not endorsed or sponsored this project; their logos are shown as trademarks…
read the full Agentic-Bug-Hunter overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Security & Privacy projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.
Frequently asked questions
Is codex-security or Agentic-Bug-Hunter more popular?
codex-security has 11,287 GitHub stars and Agentic-Bug-Hunter has 5,547. codex-security has the larger community by that measure.
Are codex-security and Agentic-Bug-Hunter free?
Both are open source. codex-security is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Agentic-Bug-Hunter under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between codex-security and Agentic-Bug-Hunter?
codex-security is written in TypeScript and Agentic-Bug-Hunter in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, codex-security or Agentic-Bug-Hunter?
Choose codex-security if you want the larger community (11,287 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Agentic-Bug-Hunter if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.