head to head · open source
codex-security vs AI-Infra-Guard
codex-security has 11,287 GitHub stars, 903 forks, 220 open issues and last shipped yesterday. AI-Infra-Guard has 7,335 stars, 725 forks, 35 open issues and last shipped yesterday. codex-security leads on adoption by 54% (11,287 vs 7,335 stars). codex-security is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; AI-Infra-Guard is written in Python under Apache-2.0. codex-security has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, AI-Infra-Guard 10%. codex-security was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai-security), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| codex-security | AI-Infra-Guard | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 11K | ★ 7.3K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 903 | ⑂ 725 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick codex-security if
- You weight community size — 11K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick AI-Infra-Guard if
- You want the AI-Infra-Guard feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and AI-Infra-Guard fits your workflow better
About codex-security
Codex Security @openai/codex security is a CLI and TypeScript SDK for defining security policy and finding, validating, and fixing security vulnerabilities in your code. 👉👉 See the Codex Security documentation for full documentation. Some cybersecurity requests and protected findings require approval through Trusted Access for Cyber. To join the program, visit chatgpt.com/cyber. Quick start Requires Node.js 22.13.0 or later and Python 3.10 or later. For CI, set OPENAI API KEY instead of signing in. Generate SECURITY.md Draft repository wide or component scoped SECURITY.md guidance for future scans: The command…
read the full codex-security overview →
About AI-Infra-Guard
📖 Documentation 🌐 🇨🇳 中文 · 🇯🇵 日本語 · 🇪🇸 Español · 🇩🇪 Deutsch · 🇫🇷 Français · 🇰🇷 한국어 · 🇧🇷 Português · 🇷🇺 Русский 🚀 AI Red Teaming Platform by Tencent Zhuque Lab A.I.G (AI Infra Guard) integrates capabilities such as ClawScan(OpenClaw Security Scan), Agent Scan，AI infra vulnerability scan, MCP Server & Agent Skills scan, and Jailbreak Evaluation, aiming to provide users with the most comprehensive, intelligent, and user friendly solution for AI security risk self examination. We are committed to making A.I.G(AI Infra Guard) the industry leading AI red teaming platform. More stars help this project…
read the full AI-Infra-Guard overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Security & Privacy projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.
Frequently asked questions
Is codex-security or AI-Infra-Guard more popular?
codex-security has 11,287 GitHub stars and AI-Infra-Guard has 7,335. codex-security has the larger community by that measure.
Are codex-security and AI-Infra-Guard free?
Both are open source. codex-security is licensed under Apache-2.0 and AI-Infra-Guard under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between codex-security and AI-Infra-Guard?
codex-security is written in TypeScript and AI-Infra-Guard in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, codex-security or AI-Infra-Guard?
Choose codex-security if you want the larger community (11,287 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose AI-Infra-Guard if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.