head to head · open source

codex-security vs open-kritt

codex-security has 11,287 GitHub stars, 903 forks, 220 open issues and last shipped yesterday. open-kritt has 2,406 stars, 407 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped yesterday. codex-security leads on adoption by 369% (11,287 vs 2,406 stars). codex-security is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; open-kritt is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0. codex-security has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, open-kritt 17%. codex-security was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai-security), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

codex-security ★ 11K open-kritt ★ 2.4K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

codex-security open-kritt
GitHub stars ★ 11K ★ 2.4K
License Apache-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 903 ⑂ 407
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick codex-security if

  • You weight community size — 11K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full codex-security profile →

pick open-kritt if

  • You want the open-kritt feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and open-kritt fits your workflow better

full open-kritt profile →

About codex-security

Codex Security @openai/codex security is a CLI and TypeScript SDK for defining security policy and finding, validating, and fixing security vulnerabilities in your code. 👉👉 See the Codex Security documentation for full documentation. Some cybersecurity requests and protected findings require approval through Trusted Access for Cyber. To join the program, visit chatgpt.com/cyber. Quick start Requires Node.js 22.13.0 or later and Python 3.10 or later. For CI, set OPENAI API KEY instead of signing in. Generate SECURITY.md Draft repository wide or component scoped SECURITY.md guidance for future scans: The command…

read the full codex-security overview →

About open-kritt

open·kritt Orchestrate AI agents to find real vulnerabilities in code. An open source, self hosted security and vulnerability research platform that turns focused AI analysis into de duplicated, ranked findings with configurable validation and enrichment. Website · Documentation · Getting started · Contributing · Owners · Research paper What is open·kritt? Pointing a model at an entire repository and asking it to find vulnerabilities rarely works well. open·kritt takes a focused approach: break the research into small, well defined tasks, run them across AI agents in parallel, and combine their output into…

read the full open-kritt overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

Related comparisons

More AI Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.

Frequently asked questions

Is codex-security or open-kritt more popular?

codex-security has 11,287 GitHub stars and open-kritt has 2,406. codex-security has the larger community by that measure.

Are codex-security and open-kritt free?

Both are open source. codex-security is licensed under Apache-2.0 and open-kritt under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between codex-security and open-kritt?

codex-security is written in TypeScript and open-kritt in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, codex-security or open-kritt?

Choose codex-security if you want the larger community (11,287 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose open-kritt if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.