head to head · open source

CocoIndex vs seatunnel-web

CocoIndex has 11,812 GitHub stars, 923 forks, 83 open issues and last shipped yesterday. seatunnel-web has 888 stars, 371 forks, 27 open issues and last shipped 10 months ago. CocoIndex leads on adoption by 1,230% (11,812 vs 888 stars). CocoIndex is written in Rust under Apache-2.0; seatunnel-web is written in Java under Apache-2.0. CocoIndex has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, seatunnel-web 42%. CocoIndex was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

CocoIndex ★ 12K seatunnel-web ★ 888 category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

CocoIndex seatunnel-web
GitHub stars ★ 12K ★ 888
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Rust Java
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-01-22
Forks ⑂ 923 ⑂ 371
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick CocoIndex if

  • You weight community size — 12K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full CocoIndex profile →

pick seatunnel-web if

  • You want the seatunnel-web feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and seatunnel-web fits your workflow better

full seatunnel-web profile →

About CocoIndex

Your agents deserve fresh context. Star us ❤️ → · · · CocoIndex turns codebases, meeting notes, inboxes, Slack, PDFs, and videos into live, continuously fresh context for your AI agents and LLM apps to reason over effectively — with minimal incremental processing. Get your production AI agent ready in 10 minutes with reliable, continuously fresh data — no stale batches, no context gap Incremental · only the delta · Any scale · parallel by default · Declarative · Python, 5 min Deutsch English Español français 日本語 한국어 Português Русский 中文 Built with CocoIndex ❤️ <img src=" alt="CocoIndex code — flagship MCP server…

read the full CocoIndex overview →

About seatunnel-web

Apache SeaTunnel SeaTunnel was formerly named Waterdrop , and renamed SeaTunnel since October 12, 2021. So, What we are? An open source web console to manage your seatunnel script, and would push them to any scheduling system easily. Click it if your want to know more about our design. 👉🏻Design Compatibility How to start Notice: Some details please refer to the docs/QuickStart.md 1 Preparing the Apache SeaTunnel environment Because SeaTunnel Web uses the SeaTunnel Java Client to submit jobs, running SeaTunnel Web requires preparing a SeaTunnel Zeta Engine service first. Based on the usage requirements of…

read the full seatunnel-web overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Related comparisons

More Data Engineering & Integration projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Engineering & Integration field.

Frequently asked questions

Is CocoIndex or seatunnel-web more popular?

CocoIndex has 11,812 GitHub stars and seatunnel-web has 888. CocoIndex has the larger community by that measure.

Are CocoIndex and seatunnel-web free?

Both are open source. CocoIndex is licensed under Apache-2.0 and seatunnel-web under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between CocoIndex and seatunnel-web?

CocoIndex is written in Rust and seatunnel-web in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, CocoIndex or seatunnel-web?

Choose CocoIndex if you want the larger community (11,812 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose seatunnel-web if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.